Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin J Wadas Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$3.6MEducation$1.2MPublic Benefit$550kYouth Development$230kHuman Services$198kHealth$77kPhilanthropy$14kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $279k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $453k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUDDA DAME THUKA TEMPLE$250,000
UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$237,715
TOWN OF TRENTON$113,813
HERKIMER COUNTY CHAPTER NYSARC INC$101,509
ROME BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC$35,000
BOONVILLE YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$32,606
Individual grant recipient$30,510
Individual grant recipient$28,187
FRIENDS OF WOODCRAFT$24,961
DOLGEVILLE POP WARNER FOOTBALL$21,726
UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,700
Individual grant recipient$16,548
CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY$14,918
ROME GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE$12,485
KELBERMAN CENTER$12,010
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY: $15k → 16%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $5k → 16%THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 91 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

91 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 75 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

91
116

Total granted

$3.1M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

11%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $714k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $80k · revenue +155%
  • TM
    THE MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +881% · 45% of their budget
  • CS
    COLISEUM SOCCER CLUB INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $46k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • WY
    WESTMORELAND YOUTH BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL
    one grant, 2023 · $249k
  • MY
    MID YORK LIBRARY SYSTEM
    one grant, 2024 · $147k · revenue -8%
  • I
    ICAN
    one grant, 2022 · $111k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Elite Sports & Recreation Inc

Youth sports and recreation for all to help develop social skills.

Recreation & Sports
2
Roxbury Youth Soccer League

Recreational soccer program

Youth Development
3
Utica Jr Comets Hockey Club Inc

Promote hockey to urban youth ages 3-18 years old in the utica,ny and surrounding areas.

Recreation & Sports
4
Richmond County Youth Complex Inc

Our year long baseball related programs help to teach all facets of the sport while achieving the highest level of team play and sportsmanship to over 100 youths.

Youth Development
5
Babylon Soccer Club Inc

Community youth soccer league

—
6
Amityville Soccer League Inc

To foster growth and development of youth under the age of 19 through the sport of soccer. the league administers the orderly management of the governmental affairs of the game of soccer in the amityville area through the work of…

Recreation & Sports
7
Eastern York Recreation Authority

To provide a place for youth to play organized sports in the eastern york area.

Human Services
8
York Youth Soccer League

The york youth soccer league (yysl) is a non profit organization dedicated to providing the youth of york county with the opportunity to participate in a recreational soccer league.

—
9
West Central Soccer Association

Childrens Recreational Sports Association

Recreation & Sports
10
Mineola Youth Foundation

Organized to construct, own, operate and maintain recreational facilities and grounds and all usual and necessary accessories to conduct baseball games, athletic sport, exhibitions and places of amusement and recreation

—
11
Union Springs Soccer Club Inc

To implant firmly in the youth of the community the ideas of sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage, and reverence by participating in organized soccer

Recreation & Sports
12
Freehold Township Little League Inc

Play little league baseball

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Neighborhood Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 235 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $351,155 · OtherUTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTBUDDA DAME THUKA TEMPLE: $250,000 · OtherWESTMORELAND YOUTH BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL: $248,972 · OtherCITY OF ROME: $215,435 · Other+177 more: $4,241,535 · Other+177 moreCOLISEUM SOCCER CLUB INC: $46,476 · Recreation & SportsROME BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $43,950 · Recreation & SportsMOHAWK VALLEY SPORTS CLUB INC: $28,436 · Recreation & SportsROME YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $25,765 · Recreation & SportsUTICA LADY KNICKS INC: $14,933 · Recreation & SportsROME GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE INC: $12,485 · Recreation & SportsKRAJISNIK FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $11,558 · Recreation & SportsUPSTATE CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $27,518 · HealthKELBERMAN CENTER INC: $24,378 · HealthTHE ROOT FARM INC: $14,242 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,145 · HealthTHE MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $70,433 · Arts & CultureKIRKLAND ART CENTER INC: $4,430 · Arts & CultureWESTERN TOWN LIBRARY: $30,722 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC: $14,316 · EducationCENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY INC: $14,918 · Human ServicesTHE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $11,986 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $5,055 · Human ServicesTHE UTICA CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT INC: $11,280 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,307,097Recreation & Sports$183,603Health$77,283Arts & Culture$74,863Education$45,038Human Services$31,959Housing & Shelter$11,280

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID YORK LIBRARY SYSTEM: $146,568 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC: $80,052 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $70,433 over 4y, 45% of budgetCOLISEUM SOCCER CLUB INC: $46,476 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetROME BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $43,950 over 2y, 55% of budgetWESTERN TOWN LIBRARY: $30,722 over 2y, 31% of budgetMOHAWK VALLEY SPORTS CLUB INC: $28,436 over 3y, 11% of budgetUPSTATE CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $27,518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROME YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $25,765 over 2y, 28% of budgetKELBERMAN CENTER INC: $24,378 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCamden Little League Inc: $20,400 over 1y, 28% of budgetUTICA LADY KNICKS INC: $14,933 over 1y, 62% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC: $14,316 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ROOT FARM INC: $14,242 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetROME GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE INC: $12,485 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $11,986 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKRAJISNIK FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $11,558 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE UTICA CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT INC: $11,280 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,145 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $5,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIRKLAND ART CENTER INC: $4,430 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID YORK LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLISEUM SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ROME BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties IncNY50.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · Bank of Utica Foundation Inc · Indium Corporation and Macartney Family Foundation Inc · Utica National Group Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mohawk Valley Inc · Rome Community Foundation · Joseph and Inez E Carbone Foundation · The Rob Esche Save of the Day Foundation Inc · Hazen B Hinman Sr Foundation Inc · The James H Wurz Jr and Edward T Wurz Sr Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin J Wadas Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin J Wadas Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 235 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin J Wadas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph