Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.3MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$789kArts & Culture$777kYouth Development$581kHousing & Shelter$395kEnvironment$225kRecreation & Sports$208kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $942k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $634k
$24,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STOUGHTON SCHOOLS$140,000
YOUTH CENTER OF STOUGHTON$106,852
MANDT COMMUNITY CENTER$92,326
STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START)$75,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI MADISON$60,000
ST ANN SCHOOL$50,000
FRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF LA CROSSE$48,000
NAGCL - NATIONAL NORWEGIAN CENTER$45,000
THREE GAITS INC$44,000
UNIVERSITY OF EAU CLAIRE$42,000
STOUGHTON AREA SENIOR CENTER$40,000
STOUGHTON LIBRARY$35,000
VESTERHEIM$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $395k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $75k → 10%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $70k → 10%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $65k → 10%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $65k → 10%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $65k → 10%STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM (START): $55k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
KY
AZ
NC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 69 repeat orgs$727k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
22

Total granted

$7.9M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+6%

Still filing today

36%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Stoughton Hospital Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $885k · revenue +158% · 41% of their budget
  • SA
    STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $395k · revenue +68%
  • MC
    MANDT COMMUNITY CENTERINC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $339k · revenue +78% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • SR
    STOUGHTON ROTARY SPECIAL PROJECTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +14% · 32% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • SS
    STOUGHTON SCHOOLS - FAB LAB
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
4
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
St Olaf College

St. olaf college challenges students to excel in the liberal arts, examine faith and values, and explore meaningful vocation in an inclusive, globally engaged community nourished by lutheran tradition.

Education
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
St Ambrose University

Mission statement: an inclusive, catholic, and diocesan community of learners, st. ambrose university empowers all ambrosians to act courageously, to seek wisdom through faith and reason, to work for justice, and to lead lives of service.…

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stoughton Area Resource Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
30/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF STOUGHTON YOUTH CENTER: $473,790 · OtherFRIENDS OF STOUGHTON YOUTH CENTERUNIVERSITY OF WI MADISON: $372,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WI MADISONIndividual grant recipient: $360,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF LA CROSSE: $321,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LA CROSSEST ANN SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherST ANN SCHOOLSTOUGHTON AREA SENIOR CENTER: $290,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF EAU CLAIRE: $192,000 · OtherNAGCL - NATIONAL NORWEGIAN CENTER: $188,700 · Other+61 more: $2,960,707 · Other+61 moreStoughton Hospital Foundation Inc: $885,000 · PhilanthropyStoughton Hos…STOUGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · PhilanthropySTOUGHTON COM…VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $138,000 · EducationVITERBO UNI…STOUGHTON SPORTS BOOSTERSINC: $115,000 · EducationSTOUGHTON S…EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $108,000 · EducationEDGEWOOD UN…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Marquette University: $60,000 · EducationMarquette U…STOUGHTON ROTARY SPECIAL PROJECTS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EducationSTOUGHTON R…ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $60,000 · EducationST NORBERT …AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · EducationCORNELL COLLEGE: $36,000 · EducationTaylor University: $36,000 · Education+13 more: $212,000 · Education+13 moreMANDT COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $339,326 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC: $226,500 · Arts & CultureSTOUGHTON OPERA HOUSE FRIENDS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSTOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $395,000 · Human ServicesALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $120,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF LAKE KEGONSA SOCIETY INC: $105,000 · EnvironmentTHREE GAITS INC: $210,140 · Recreation & SportsTHE STOUGHTON FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $4,840 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,458,197Philanthropy$1,065,000Education$933,000Arts & Culture$590,826Human Services$395,000Environment$225,000Recreation & Sports$210,140Food & Nutrition$4,840

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStoughton Hospital Foundation Inc: $885,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetSTOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $395,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetMANDT COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $339,326 over 6y, 32% of budgetFRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC: $226,500 over 5y, 36% of budgetTHREE GAITS INC: $210,140 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetSTOUGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 59: $150,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $138,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $120,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSTOUGHTON SPORTS BOOSTERSINC: $115,000 over 2y, 66% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $108,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE KEGONSA SOCIETY INC: $105,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMarquette University: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTOUGHTON ROTARY SPECIAL PROJECTS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF STOUGHTON: $52,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTaylor University: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA UNIVERSITY: $24,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity International University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARANATHA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Stoughton Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STOUGHTON AREA RESOURCE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds MANDT COMMUNITY CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE GAITS INC ↗
  • Who funds STOUGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 59 ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STOUGHTON SPORTS BOOSTERSINC ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE KEGONSA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds STOUGHTON ROTARY SPECIAL PROJECTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Wahlin Foundation Inc · Tobola Educational Trust · The Casper Foundation · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Culver's Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin E and Janet L Bryant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph