Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin and Jeanne Woods Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$800k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$941kAnimals$691kHealth$600kArts & Culture$550kYouth Development$521kHousing & Shelter$420kReligion$295kFood & Nutrition$235kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $766k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$35,000
Pacific Conservatory of the Perf Ar$30,000
Partners in Housing Solutions$30,000
Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Santa Maria Philharmonic$30,000
New Beginnings$25,000
Woods Humane Society$25,000
OASIS Center$25,000
Santa Barbara Humane Society$25,000
MOVE Santa Barbara County$25,000
Planned Parenthood$25,000
Marian Regional Medical Center Fdn$25,000
Santa Barbara Maritime Museum$25,000
CASA of Santa Barbara County$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Angels Foster Care: $15k → 9%Angel's Foster Care: $10k → 14%Angels Foster Care: $15k → 9%Angel's Foster Care: $10k → 14%Angels Foster Care: $15k → 9%Catholic Charities of Los Angeles: $20k → 14%Angels Foster Care: $12k → 9%Life Steps Foundation: $10k → 14%Angels Foster Care: $10k → 9%Rescue Mission Alliance: $20k → 10%Rescue Mission Alliance: $15k → 10%Domestic Violence Solutions: $20k → 14%Domestic Violence Solutions: $20k → 14%Domestic Violence Solutions: $18k → 14%Domestic Violence Solutions: $15k → 14%Gradalupe Kids Come First: $6k → 14%OASIS: $25k → 14%OASIS: $25k → 14%OASIS: $20k → 14%OASIS: $20k → 14%OASIS: $15k → 14%OASIS: $15k → 14%Central Coast Rescue Mission: $25k → 14%Central Coast Rescue Mission: $20k → 14%Community Partners in Caring: $20k → 14%Cuyama Valley Family Resource Cente: $15k → 14%Community Partners in Caring: $5k → 14%Community Partners in Caring: $5k → 14%CommUnify: $10k → 14%Cuyama Valley Family Resource Cente: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 69 repeat orgs$524k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
23

Total granted

$5.5M
$350k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+25%

Still filing today

49%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +49%
  • SM
    SANTA MARIA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +147%
  • FB
    FIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +388%

Funded once

  • DC
    Dunes Center
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • UC
    UCLA Chicano Studies Research Cente
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County

To provide high-quality civil legal services to vulnerable santa barbara county residents.

Crime & Legal
2
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
3
San Benito County Community Services Development Corporation

To pursue affordable housing for low to moderate income residents by fostering strategic relationships with other agencies.

Housing & Shelter
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Santa Cruz County

CASA of Santa Cruz advocates for children and youth, providing court appointed volunteers so each child in the dependency and juvenile court system feels cared for and connected with the people, families and resources they need to heal and…

Civil Rights
5
Children and Family Resource Services

To provide high quality, family-focused, strength-based services to build reslient communities throughout santa barbara county, including newborn visitation, parent & teacher education

Human Services
6
Santa Barbara South Coast Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the santa barbara south coast chamber of commerce is to create a strong local economy, promote the community, provide business resources and networking opportunities and represent business to the government.

—
7
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
8
Santa Barbara County Animal Care Foundation Inc

To provide better care for animals in santa barbara county shelters.

Animals
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
10
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—
11
Santa Barbara New House

New house dedicates itself to providing a clean and sober, healthy environment that allows men with alcohol and other drug problems to begin their journey of recovery and to reclaim their dignity, self-esteem, and sense of purpose. new…

Health
12
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Solutions for Santa Barbara County; the most unlike its peers is Los Alamos Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
35/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $230,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFood Bank of SBC: $220,000 · OtherFood Bank of SBCSANTA MARIA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY: $210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $205,000 · OtherNew Beginnings: $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $155,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $145,000 · OtherSANTA MARIA VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $145,000 · Other+71 more: $2,615,444 · Other+71 moreWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $225,000 · AnimalsWOODS HUMAN…SANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150,000 · AnimalsSANTA BARBA…CARE4Paws Inc: $95,000 · AnimalsCARE4Paws I…ANIMALS IN NEED: $85,000 · AnimalsANIMALS IN …Pacific Wildlife Care: $40,000 · AnimalsPacific Wil…ORCUTT AREA SENIORS IN SERVICE INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $87,000 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $80,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $73,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING: $30,000 · Human ServicesCUYAMA VALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $25,940 · Human ServicesFIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY: $185,000 · HealthMARIAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthHearts Aligned Inc: $25,000 · HealthFuture Leaders of America: $135,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentPCPA FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $145,000 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ALAMOS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterGOOD SAMARITAN SHELTER: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterTRANSITION HOUSE: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,090,444Animals$595,000Human Services$465,940Health$285,000Youth Development$210,000Philanthropy$205,000Housing & Shelter$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA MARIA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY: $210,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetFIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY: $185,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPCPA FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $145,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetPARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $145,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetSANTA MARIA VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $145,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetFuture Leaders of America: $135,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCALM INC: $130,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetORCUTT AREA SENIORS IN SERVICE INC: $120,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc: $95,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $87,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetANIMALS IN NEED: $85,000 over 7y, 76% of budgetPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPathpoint: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMARIAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $73,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $65,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTRANSITIONSMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Coast Literacy Council: $55,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION: $50,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SHELTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Center: $45,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetFUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPacific Wildlife Care: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM: $36,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BICYCLE COALITION DBA MOVE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $35,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING: $30,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCUYAMA VALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ACTION NETWORK: $30,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetHearts Aligned Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRANSITION HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ALAMOS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetONE COMMUNITY ACTION OF SANTA MARIA VALLEY: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetVTC ENTERPRISES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOMENTUM WORK INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Kids Come First Foundation: $5,940 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds PCPA FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Future Leaders of America ↗
  • Who funds CALM INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCUTT AREA SENIORS IN SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMALS IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds Pathpoint ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRANSITIONSMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Coast Literacy Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA75.4× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The McCune Foundation · Mark and Dorothy Smith Family Foundation · Roy and Ida Eagle Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · James S Bower Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin and Jeanne Woods Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin and Jeanne Woods Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin and Jeanne Woods Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph