· Private foundation
Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $893k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $410k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ESPERANZA ACADEMY | $250,000 |
| YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC | $105,000 |
| MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST | $75,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY | $65,000 |
| JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER | $60,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN | $55,000 |
| OUR NEIGHBORS' TABLE | $50,000 |
| HAWC - HEALING ABUSE WORKING FOR CHANGE INC | $45,000 |
| THE RESOLUTION CENTER | $40,000 |
| FIRST PARISH NEWBURY FOOD PANTRY | $35,000 |
| NOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL | $35,000 |
| UTEC | $35,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY | $30,000 |
| FIREHOUSE CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $30,000 |
| BELLESINI ACADEMY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $365k · revenue +450%
JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $330k · revenue +58%- ONOur Neighbors' Table Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- AJANNA JAQUES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue -8%
YWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCone grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue +5%- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES NORTHone grant, 2020 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.
Empowering children, young adults and families to achieve greater independence and emotional well-being.
Resident Service Coordinators are professionals who serve elders, youth and families in their housing communities. NERSC provides training & professional development, including on-line courses for Resident Service Coordinators and housing…
Since 1972, the open center for children has worked in partnership with families to create a nurturing early education and care experience. the play-based curriculum inspires children to become motivated, self-directed learners, feel…
MassHire Metro North Workforce Board's mission is to develop partnerships, generate resources, and advocate for workforce solutions that result in a skilled workforce, prospering businesses, and equitable access to meaningful career…
Laboure college provides high-quality education and prepares women and men for careers in nursing and allied health fields.
Glhfc's mission is to improve and maintain the health of individuals and families in the merrimack valley by providing a network of high quality, comprehensive health care services and by training health care professionals who can respond…
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
The Boston Higher Education Resource Center equips first generation youth to obtain a higher education, break the cycle of poverty, and become agents of change in their communities.
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family & Children's Service of Greater Lynn Inc and the most unlike its peers is Endicott College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Our Neighbors' Table Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Pettengill House Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALING ABUSE WORKING FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC FKA NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY MEDIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LA VIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS FOR CHILDRENINC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds UTEC Inc ↗
- Who funds ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Groundwork Lawrence Inc ↗
- Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds The Haven Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Essex Art Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Straight Ahead Ministries INC ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Lowell's Maritime Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ANNA JAQUES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Rogers Family Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · People's United Community Foundation of Eastern Massachusetts Inc · The Peter and Elizabeth C Tower Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lawrence Family Development Inc — 100% of income from government
- Pathways for Childreninc — 86% of income from government
- Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
- The Resolution Center Inc Fka North Shore Community Mediationinc — 60% of income from government
- Community Action Inc — 52% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc — 27% of income from government
- Straight Ahead Ministries Inc — 27% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- Suenos Basketball — 22% of income from government
- Nourishing the North Shore Inc — 20% of income from government
- Citizens Inn Inc — 18% of income from government
- Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated — 16% of income from government
- La Vida Inc — 11% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
- Wellspring House Inc — 9% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beyond Soccer Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc — 5% of income from government
- Youth Development Organization Inc — 4% of income from government
- Anna Jaques Hospital Inc — 4% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Greater Lowell — 3% of income from government
- Action Inc — 3% of income from government
- Essex Art Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Governor Dummer Academy the Governor's Academy — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Endicott College — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.