Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward Nixon McKay Memorial

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$177k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,750
Median grant
4
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FBO$7,500
UNIV OF GEORGIA FBO LILLIAN SPLENDORE$7,500
VANDERBILT UNIV FBO SADIE HAYNES$3,750
UNIV OF GEORGIA FBO SARA ABERNATHY$3,750
JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIV FBO JANIYA$2,500
KENNESAW STATE UNIV FBO NEBRIA ASKEW$2,500
KENNESAW STATE UNIV FBO AMARIDASIA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MA
IN
CT
CA
TN
SC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 8 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
58

Total granted

$28k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+43%

Still filing today

13%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GEORGIA HIGHLANDS COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $7k
  • JS
    JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k
  • GN
    GEORGIA NORTHWESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF WEST GEORGIA FBO JAYLON
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • GP
    GRACY PADGETT CO MERCER UNIV
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HH
    HALEY HELBING CO UNIVERISTY OF SOUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the South

An Episcopal University composed of the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Theology.

Education
2
North Greenville University

The university offers a quality education in a biblically sound, christ-centered environment.

Education
3
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
4
Gardner-Webb University

Gardner-webb university, a private, christian, baptist-related university, provides outstanding undergraduate and graduate education that is strongly grounded in the liberal arts while offering opportunities to prepare for various…

Education
5
John Brown University

Provide a christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others.

Education
6
Asbury College

A christian liberal arts university committed to academic excellence and spiritual vitality equipping students for a lifetime of learning, leadership, and service.

Education
7
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering students undergraduate and graduate courses.

Education
8
Johnson University

Johnson university is a private, coeducational institution of higher learning offering associate, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees.

Education
9
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
10
Spring Arbor University

Spring arbor university provides post-secondary education to over 2,441 students, granting ba, bs, ma ,ms, and dnp degrees.

Education
11
Howard Payne University

To provide academic preparation in a christian context for a diverse student body.

Education
12
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's university is a catholic benedictine institute of higher education that empowers students to pursue a lifetime of learning and accomplishment in all arenas of human endeavor.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shorter University; the most unlike its peers is Indiana University Radiology Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FBO: $7,500 · OtherUNIV OF GEORGIA FBO LILLIAN SPLENDORE: $7,500 · OtherGEORGIA HIGHLANDS COLLEGE: $7,000 · Other+63 more: $146,006 · Other+63 moreSamford University: $2,000 · EducationSHORTER UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationClark Atlanta University Inc: $1,000 · EducationTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 · EducationCARSON-NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education
Other$168,006Education$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSamford University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHORTER UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARSON-NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds SHORTER UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward Nixon McKay Memorial funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward Nixon McKay Memorial. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward Nixon McKay Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph