Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
10
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $83k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
1
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2017
$800
Largest grant, FY2017
$28,000
States reached, FY2017
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$134kReligion$45kHealth$37kEducation$26kArts & Culture$800Community Improvement$500Public Benefit$500Public Safety & Disaster$50Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
St John Lutheran Church$28,0001n/a
Methodist Health System Foundation Inc$25,00011%
Bill Dasch Ministries Inc$17,0002n/a
Mansfield Commission for the Arts$8001n/a
Battle of the Nines Charity$5001n/a
Mansfield Womens Club$50011%
Phelan McDermid Syndrome Foundation$30010%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($38k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation with peer funders

About The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation

How much does The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation give?
The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $83,250 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (55%), Religion (18%), Health (15%).
Who are The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: St John Lutheran Church ($28k), Methodist Health System Foundation Inc ($25k), Bill Dasch Ministries Inc ($17k).
Does The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation based?
The Edward and Carol Esstman Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward and Carol Esstman’s filings →

More from the funding graph