Skip to content

· Public charity

Education Reimagined

To make learner-centered education available to each and every child in the united states, inclusive of race, background, and circumstance.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $101,829, the rows itemized in this filing. The $107,784 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,955 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$8,333
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FBF EDUCATION COLLECTIVE INC$10,166
THE LAB SCHOOL OF MEMPHIS$8,333
NACA INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK$8,333
BIG THOUGHT$8,333
THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY LLC$8,333
LIBERTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$8,333
SPARKNC$8,333
PURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL$8,333
NORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,333
FABNEWPORT$8,333
ROCK TREE SKY$8,333
THE PAST FOUNDATION$8,333
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROCK TREE SKY: $8k → 10%FBF EDUCATION COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 20%BIG THOUGHT: $8k → 14%NACA INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK: $8k → 14%LIBERTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 8%NORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 5%THE LAB SCHOOL OF MEMPHIS: $8k → 17%SPARKNC: $8k → 12%FABNEWPORT: $8k → 7%PURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 16%THE PAST FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
RI
CA
MO
NM
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
2
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
3
Innovations in Education - a Nelson Project
Education
4
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
5
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
6
Thrive Ed

Thrive Ed's purpose is to fundamentally transform education by powering teachers, leadership teams, and students individually and collectively, to thrive in school and life and in a global society, and transform education as we know it…

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
9
Creative Minds International Public Charter School

The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.

Education
10
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
11
Literacy Design Collaborative Inc

Seeks to ensure that every student in america graduates from (continued on schedule o) high school with the literacy skills necessary for success in college and career. ldc is a teacher-created instructional design system that transforms…

Education
12
Pacific Northern Academy

To educate students to be exceptional learners and independent thinkers of vision, courage, and integrity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Purdue Polytechnic High School of Indianapolis Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Lab School of Memphis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUNWAY GREEN INC: $18,499 · EducationRUNWAY GREEN INCPURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $8,333 · EducationPURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL OF INDIANAPOLIS INCThe Lab School of Memphis Inc: $8,333 · EducationThe Lab School of Memphis IncTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $8,333 · EducationTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANYFABNEWPORT INC: $8,333 · EducationFABNEWPORT INCNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK: $8,333 · EducationNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORKSPARKNC: $8,333 · EducationSPARKNCNORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8,333 · OtherNORRIS SCHOOL DIST…LIBERTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8,333 · OtherLIBERTY PUBLIC SCH…PAST FOUNDATION: $8,333 · Arts & CulturePAST FOUN…Rock Tree Sky: $8,333 · Youth DevelopmentRock Tree…
Education$68,497Other$16,666Arts & Culture$8,333Youth Development$8,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUNWAY GREEN INC: $18,499 over 1y, 16% of budgetPAST FOUNDATION: $8,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRock Tree Sky: $8,333 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $8,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lab School of Memphis Inc: $8,333 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $8,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFABNEWPORT INC: $8,333 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK: $8,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARKNC: $8,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Education Reimagined funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Education Reimagined. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Education Reimagined’s filings →

    More from the funding graph