Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edith Elizabeth Greene-Cowles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MEducation$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
$10,425
Median grant
1
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LES AMIS DU CDC LA TERMITIERE$30,000
ASSOCIATION DE CEUX QUI$25,000
ASSOCIATION NDAR DANCE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ASSOCIATION ARTISTIQUE DEVELOPPEMENT (ENGAGEMENT FEMININ)$10,425
JASP'$10,000
ASSOCIATION ART AU DEL DU HANDICAP$10,000
ASSOCIATION ANKATA$10,000
FASO DANSE THEATRE$10,000
OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL$2,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 5% of grant dollars ($68k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 95% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 8% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANIKAYA: $8k → 8%MA DESIGN ART & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 11%LIFE THROUGH DANCE: $10k → 17%C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO: $204k → 5%LES AMIS DU CDC LA TERMITIERE: $30k → 8%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $7k → 11%LIFE THROUGH DANCE: $2k → 17%C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO: $176k → 5%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $5k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $4k → 17%C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO: $157k → 5%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $5k → 11%C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO: $118k → 5%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $5k → 11%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $5k → 11%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $5k → 11%OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 95% of all-years giving ($1.2M)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$697k · 7 grants
Burkina Faso$278k · 15 grants
Mali$209k · 8 grants
Senegal$50k · 3 grants
Belgium$10k · 1 grant
Côte d'Ivoire$6k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+30%

Still filing today

22%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $654k
  • AD
    ASSOCIATION DE CEUX QUI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $189k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $133k

Funded once

  • AB
    ASSOCIATION BOUGOU SABA ML
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • MD
    MASS Design Art & Technology Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

C'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASO: $654,227 · OtherC'EST COMMENT CO MME FIORASOASSOCIATION DE CEUX QUI: $188,596 · OtherASSOCIATION DE CEUX QUIIndividual grant recipient: $132,825 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSOCIATION ANKATA: $70,170 · OtherASSOCIATION ANKATAASSOCIATION NDAR DANCE: $50,000 · OtherASSOCIATION ART AU DEL DU HANDICAP: $45,510 · Other+11 more: $126,964 · Other+11 moreOUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $34,600 · EducationMASS Design Art & Technology Institute Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $4,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,268,292Education$34,600Arts & Culture$14,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $34,600 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE THROUGH DANCE INC: $11,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetMASS Design Art & Technology Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $4,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LIFE THROUGH DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MASS Design Art & Technology Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edith Elizabeth Greene-Cowles Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edith Elizabeth Greene-Cowles Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Our Sisters School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith Elizabeth Greene-Cowles’ filings →

More from the funding graph