Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edgar a & Ida M Alekna Foundation

$4k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Education$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$2kAnimals$950Recreation & Sports$350Youth Development$150Other$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON COLLEGE$2,500
SEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN$500
ALLIED FOUNDATION$500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS PA$100
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$100
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH$100
CHOP FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$22k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
HealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JOHNSON COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • SL
    SEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • AF
    ALLIED FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • GH
    GEISINGER HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +118%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • PC
    PENN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health
7
Geisinger Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community services.

Health
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
12
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNSON COLLEGE: $14,500 · EducationJOHNSON COLLEGEGLOBAL POWERLINE ACADEMY: $2,100 · OtherGLOBAL POWERLINE ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION: $900 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATIO…PENN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherPENN COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $350 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANI…MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $260 · Other+16 more: $1,300 · Other+16 moreGEISINGER HEALTH: $1,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $350 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $240 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · Health+2 more: $100 · HealthSEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionALLIED FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 · EnvironmentWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 · Human Services
Education$14,500Other$6,410Health$1,890Food & Nutrition$1,500Youth Development$1,500Environment$50Human Services$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNSON COLLEGE: $14,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALLIED FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTROSE MINUTE MEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFWM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTROSE MINUTE MEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FWM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edgar a & Ida M Alekna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edgar a & Ida M Alekna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edgar a & Ida M Alekna’s filings →

More from the funding graph