Skip to content
Economic Alliance Snohomish County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Economic Alliance Snohomish County

The alliance is commited to growing and nurturing a vital regionaleconomy that is globally competitive by expanding partnerships, developing key resources, and building the infrastructure systems that create local and regional employment centers.

$224k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$834kPublic Safety & Disaster$138kCommunity Improvement$137kFood & Nutrition$119kHuman Services$116kHousing & Shelter$93kEmployment$91kArts & Culture$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE$90,000
EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NW WASHINGTON$65,000
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT$35,000
EVERETT PUBLIC SCHOOLS$18,499
FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CRUISE PLANNERS: $7k → 7%WILLIAMS & PARTNERS LLC: $7k → 9%BENN BOYS LLC: $10k → 9%KAIZEN CULTURE LLC: $10k → 9%FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS: $16k → 9%SUKEEBERRY LLC QUICK PHONES 19: $7k → 12%GANGNAM KOREAN RESTAURANT: $7k → 9%SPROUTS PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE: $10k → 9%EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NW WASHINGTON: $65k → 9%RUSTY PELICAN CAFE EDMONDS INC: $10k → 9%FULLPASSPORT LLC: $7k → 9%CLAIRE'S PANTRY LLC: $10k → 9%MONGOLIAN GRILL MUKILTEO LLC: $7k → 9%THG MANAGEMENT WA LLC: $10k → 9%WHIPLASH: $7k → 9%ZEER H &T LLC: $7k → 9%GARY CHUPIK LEADERSHIP LLC: $7k → 9%EARTHART INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 9%HAIR DAY: $7k → 9%CKJ CORPORATION DBAIMA'S STUD: $7k → 9%MEENAKSHE TOMAR DDS PLLC: $7k → 9%LASHES BY LOUIE LLC: $7k → 9%EVENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES: $7k → 9%CURA PERSONALIS ANESTHESIA PLLC: $7k → 9%NEATNICS CLEANING: $7k → 9%UPVANCE INVESTMENTS LLC: $7k → 9%C & K HOSPITALITY LLC: $10k → 9%EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $90k → 9%EVERETT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $18k → 9%BEHAR'S FURNITURE: $10k → 9%STATIC ENERGY INCORPORATED: $10k → 9%SPARK HOT YOGA LLC: $10k → 9%MATTRESS CITY INC: $10k → 9%HARBOR INVESTMENT INC: $10k → 9%HEAVENLY NAILS AND SPA INC: $10k → 9%DAWN'S CRAFT HOUSE: $10k → 9%TOWN OF DARRINGTON: $22k → 9%THE AMARILLO COMPANY LLC: $10k → 9%SANG AH USA: $10k → 9%DELLA TERRA CATERING: $10k → 9%EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $35k → 9%POULOS INC: $10k → 9%TANGLES AND LOCS SALON AND SPA: $10k → 9%CASA OAXACA LLC: $10k → 9%BELLEVUE BADMINTON CLUB INC: $10k → 9%CITY OF ARLINGTON: $20k → 9%JS GROUP INC: $10k → 9%GLENEAGLE FAMILY RESTAURANT BAR & GRILL: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 234 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $90,000 · OtherEVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGEEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $65,000 · Other+197 more: $1,454,845 · Other+197 moreFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS: $16,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,609,845Youth Development$16,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS: $16,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Workforce Development…Ndc Housing & Economi…
Workforce Development Council Snohomish CountyWA28.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Workforce Development Council Snohomish County · Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group Return

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Economic Alliance Snohomish County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Economic Alliance Snohomish County. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 234 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Economic Alliance Snohomish County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home