Skip to content
EcoHealth Alliance Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

EcoHealth Alliance Inc

EcoHealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$287k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$3.7MAnimals$2.0MHealth$1.5MEducation$1.2MInternational$825kScience & Tech$536k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $483,876, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,321,646 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $837,770 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $197k
  • $250k+1 grant · $287k
$123,150
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation$286,688
Solimar International$123,150
Washington State University$74,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES: $125k → 7%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $52k → 11%CU MAILMAN (COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY): $850k → 17%Solimar International: $702k → 14%University of Tennessee - Knoxville: $129k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $245k → 13%PARTNERS IN ANIMAL PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION: $758k → 7%DISTRIBUTED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INC: $92k → 7%Rector & Visitors of the Univ of Virginia: $28k → 8%UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSTN (USRA): $157k → 6%HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION: $443k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY: $55k → 11%INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC: $65k → 7%Weill Medical College of Cornell University: $28k → 17%SOLIMAR INTERNATIONAL: $542k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $151k → 13%Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation: $694k → 7%THE RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINI: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $89k → 6%HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION: $278k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY: $20k → 11%International Society for Infectious Diseases INC: $15k → 7%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MAILMAN: $925k → 17%SOLIMAR INTERNATIONAL: $157k → 14%The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: $151k → 13%Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation: $287k → 7%Universities Space Research Association (USRA): $83k → 6%Henry M Jackson Foundation: $259k → 8%Columbia University Mailman: $414k → 17%Solimar International: $123k → 14%The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: $37k → 13%Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation: $250k → 7%UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $81k → 6%Henry M Jackson Foundation: $201k → 8%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%Universities Space Research Association: $63k → 6%HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION: $173k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY: $32k → 14%Henry M Jackson Foundation: $85k → 8%Georgetown University: $9k → 14%American Society for Microbiolgy: $32k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $826k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$643k · 78% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Conservation

Sub-Saharan Africa$183k · 22% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: Conservation

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 11 repeat orgs$427k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$7.1M
$427k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+45%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthScience & TechEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +25%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $63k · revenue +9%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $28k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
    one grant, 2024 · $129k
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +30%
  • DI
    DISTRIBUTED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $92k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Institute On Science for Global Policy

The institute on science for global policy (isgp) designs, organizes, and convenes conferences, programs, and related activities intended to significantly improve the accurate communication of credible scientific and technological ideas,…

Health
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
9
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
International Society for the Study of Early Medieval England
—
12
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Society for Infectious Diseases Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Solimar International: $1,523,793 · OtherSolimar InternationalWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $765,241 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $584,191 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPE…THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $129,467 · Other+4 more: $233,409 · Other+4 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,189,017 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…+2 more: $79,937 · EducationPartners in Animal Protection and Conservation: $1,987,979 · AnimalsPartners in Animal Prot…HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $1,438,819 · HealthHENRY M JACKSON FOU…INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC: $125,209 · HealthINTERNATIONAL SOCIE…INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC: $80,446 · HealthUniversities Space Research Association: $472,353 · Science & TechAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY: $63,429 · Science & Tech
Other$3,236,101Education$2,268,954Animals$1,987,979Health$1,644,474Science & Tech$535,782

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,189,017 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPartners in Animal Protection and Conservation: $1,987,979 over 4y, 61% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $1,438,819 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversities Space Research Association: $472,353 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC: $125,209 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY: $63,429 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBucknell University: $52,014 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $27,923 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Partners in Animal Protection and Conservation ↗
  • Who funds HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds Universities Space Research Association ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR INFECTIOUS DISEASES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization EcoHealth Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from EcoHealth Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on EcoHealth Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home