Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$902k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $336k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $550k
$27,168
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACEPOINT CHURCH OF PEABODY$50,000
MARION COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #4$50,000
PEABODY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER$50,000
PRAIRIE LAWN CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$50,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$50,000
HARVEY COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1$50,000
SUNFLOWER THEATRE FOUNDATION$50,000
NEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$50,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$50,000
HESSTON RESCUE UNIT$50,000
AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY POST 95$50,000
MARION SENIOR CENTER$49,948
THE HUB YOUTH CENTER$43,700
MARION KIWANIS CLUB$30,940
HILLSBORO GOLDEN YEARS CLUB$27,168
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HILLSBORO COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER: $12k → 10%MARION ADVANCEMENT CAMPAIGN: $22k → 10%HESSTON AREA SENIORS: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
3
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

—
4
Henderson County Food Pantry

Providing food to the needy

—
5
Kansas Grazing Lands Coalition Inc

To regenerate kansas grazing land resources through cooperative management, economics, ecology, production, education and technical assistance programs.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Midland Theater Foundation Inc

Restoration and operation of historic building for use by the community.

Arts & Culture
7
Shelby County Fair Association

Conduct the annual county fair

Recreation & Sports
8
St Marys Weller Cemetery Association

Cemetery

—
9
Scott County Historical Society Inc

Preserve history

—
10
Marion Historical Society Inc

Promote history of marion iowa

Arts & Culture
11
Cass County Historical Society Inc

Preserve cass county history

—
12
Shelby County Historical Society

Preserve the history of shelby county al

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newton Ministerial Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sunflower Theatre Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY POST 95: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY POST 95PEABODY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $50,000 · OtherPEABODY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INCPRAIRIE LAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherPRAIRIE LAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONHARVEY COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1: $50,000 · OtherHARVEY COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCHNEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50,000 · OtherNEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARYGRACEPOINT CHURCH OF PEABODY: $50,000 · OtherGRACEPOINT CHURCH OF PEABODYHESSTON RESCUE UNIT: $50,000 · OtherHESSTON RESCUE UNITMARION COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #4: $50,000 · OtherMARION COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #4MARION SENIOR CENTER INC: $49,948 · OtherMARION SENIOR CENTER INCTHE HUB YOUTH CENTER INC: $43,700 · OtherTHE HUB YOUTH CENTER INCMARION KIWANIS CLUB: $30,940 · OtherHILLSBORO GOLDEN YEARS CLUB INC: $27,168 · Other+9 more: $136,559 · Other+9 moreSunflower Theatre Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMARION ADVANCEMENT CAMPAIGN INC: $22,200 · Human ServicesHILLSBORO COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $11,600 · Human ServicesHESSTON AREA SENIORS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEWTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKANSAS WILDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Environment
Other$788,315Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$43,800Philanthropy$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSunflower Theatre Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFLORENCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetNEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetNEWTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetKANSAS WILDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAIRIE LAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Sunflower Theatre Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARION ADVANCEMENT CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSBORO COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HESSTON AREA SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS WILDSCAPE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kansas Community FoundationKS22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kansas Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril Charitable?

    Find your warmest path to Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eberhard Charles Neysa and Terril’s filings →

    More from the funding graph