· Public charity
Eastex Detachment Marine Corps League
Provide camaraderie and fellowship for the purpose of preserving the traditions and promoting the interests of the United States Marine Corps
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $132,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $202,476 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,476 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VETERANS & PATRIOTS UNITED | $30,000 |
| FOB RASOR | $30,000 |
| SUNNY CREEK RANCH EQUINE SERVICES | $14,000 |
| THE BIRDWELL FOUNDATION | $14,000 |
| TOMBALL HS JJROTC BOOSTER CLUB | $12,000 |
| MAGNOLIA ISD | $10,000 |
| GOD'S GARAGE INC | $10,000 |
| HENRY'S HOME HORSE & HUMANE SANCTUARY | $6,000 |
| BRONCO COMPANY PARENT GROUP | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGods Garage Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $98k · revenue +16%
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF SIOUX FALLS2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +104%
- HHHenrys Home Horse and Human Sanctuary5× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +584%
Funded once
- PFPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +35%
- CRCANNON RECOVERY-TRANSITIONAL LIVING AND SUPPORT FOR VETERANS INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
- CSCalvary Steel Ministriesone grant, 2021 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Raise and train service dogs for veterans and first responders with ptsd at no charge to them.
Supplying service dogs to verterans with post traumatic stress disorder.
Ptsd & physical therapy for vet and first responders
Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…
Helping veterans with ptsd and traumatic brain injuries regain quality of life using service dogs.
Provide equine-assisted post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd) treatment to current and former us service members and first responders regardless of the source of trauma or characterization of military service at no charge to the client.
Veteran and 1st Reponders equine therapy
To complement traditional treatment for veterans with ptsd, tbi, and mst by training them and a dog to become highly effective service dog teams
Providing service dogs to veterans and first responders
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ptsd Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Cisd Educational Support Groups Inc Twcp Jrotc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Gods Garage Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds Henrys Home Horse and Human Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds FOB RASOR ↗
- Who funds Sunny Creek Ranch Equine Services ↗
- Who funds Combined Arms ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds CISD EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT GROUPS INC TWCP JROTC ↗
- Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CANNON RECOVERY-TRANSITIONAL LIVING AND SUPPORT FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montgomery County Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eastex Detachment Marine Corps League funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.