· Public charity
Eastern Chapter of the Foundation for No
To promote the management of and to safeguard against the extinction of all species of wild sheep native to the continent of north america as well as support hunters' rights.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $132,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $161,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL BIGHORN SHEEP CENTER | $26,000 |
| WYOMING WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| IDAHO WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOC | $15,000 |
| WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
| ARIZONA DESERT BIGHORN SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| MONTANA WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CAMP FREEDOM | $7,500 |
| OUTDOOR YOUTH ACTIVITIES (CAMERON COUNTY) | $7,500 |
| KEYSTONE ELK COUNTRY ALLIANCE | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WWWYOMING WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue -104%
- WSWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $86k · revenue +83%
- NBNATIONAL BIGHORN SHEEP CENTER INC2× · 2024–2025 · $71k · revenue -1%
Funded once
- WGWYOMING GAME & FISH DEPARTMENTone grant, 2020 · $85k
- CCCALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE FOUNDATION FOR NORTH AMERICAN WILD SHEEPone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- TBTEXAS BIGHORN SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.
Promote and preserve bighorn sheep
To promote the procurement and release of big game species, to assist with the improvement of habitat in NE Nevada area, to assist state and local wildlife management authorities, and to raise funds to support these and related purposes.
Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.
To secure and maintain habitat for the northern american wild sheep to benefit of hunters and non hunters hunters
Enhance wild sheep populations, promote scientific wildlife management, educate the public on sheep and enhance sheep hunting and view opportunities in alaska.
Educating the public about the biology, habitat and welfare of the Pronghorn.
Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.
To promote and enhance increasing populations of indigenous wild sheep on the north american continent, to safeguard against the decline or extinction of such species, and to fund programs for professional management of these populations,…
To promote and protect Wildlife
To protect and conserve wildlife and its habitat
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cameron County Outdoor Youth Activities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WYOMING WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BIGHORN SHEEP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IDAHO WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE FOUNDATION FOR NORTH AMERICAN WILD SHEEP ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE ELK COUNTRY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CAMERON COUNTY OUTDOOR YOUTH ACTIVITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIGHORN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR NORTH AMERICAN WILD SHEEP MONTANA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds CAMP FREEDOM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Iowa Chapter of the Foundation for North American · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eastern Chapter of the Foundation for No funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eastern Chapter of the Foundation for No?
Find your warmest path to Eastern Chapter of the Foundation for No through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.