· Public charity
East-West Management Institute Inc
The east-west management institute, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $2,229,244 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,237,240 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,007,996 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $775k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION | $700,090 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT FOR PROFIT LAW (ICNL) | $389,720 |
| NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE (NDI) | $333,678 |
| STREET LAW | $185,243 |
| THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION (ILF) | $182,808 |
| LUAT KHOA (LIV) LEGAL INITIATIVES FOR VIETNAM | $98,580 |
| JUSTICE INNOVATION INC (JI) | $88,853 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA | $81,913 |
| ADAPT CONSULTING LLC | $81,229 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW | $56,597 |
| RANA LABS LLC | $18,020 |
| GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (GWU) | $12,513 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $11M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $11M to organizations and $441k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT · RULE OF LAW · PARTICIPANT/TRAINEE COSTS
Stated purpose: RULE OF LAW · CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT · PARTICIPANT/TRAINEE COSTS
Stated purpose: CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT · PARTICIPANT/TRAINEE COSTS
Stated purpose: RULE OF LAW · CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC6× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +4%
- NDNATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +6%
- TITHE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION LTD3× · 2022–2024 · $429k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- AFASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESSIVE COMMUNICATIONSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +178%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
Islp is a nonpartisan, politically neutral nonprofit organization that mobilizes international pro bono legal support to promote the rule of law and accountable, sustainable global economic development.
Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…
Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.
The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…
The objectives and goals of the institute shall be to receive and administer funds for the purpose of providing and supporting educational programs for lawyers, legal academics, and members of the judiciary, conferences and publications…
To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.
Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Inc and the most unlike its peers is Legal Initiatives for Vietnam. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds STREET LAW INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL INITIATIVES FOR VIETNAM ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds WORLD WIDE WEB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESSIVE COMMUNICATIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Endowment for Democracy · The Ford Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization East-West Management Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.