Skip to content

· Public charity

East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition

To increase the use of cleaner american fuels, vehicles and energy-saving transportation technologies; to improve air quality and health; to curb dependence on imported petroleum and support tennessee's economy.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$5.4MEducation$334kPublic Benefit$22kPhilanthropy$17k
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 44 grants below total $1,289,420, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,325,115 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,695 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $781k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $483k
$24,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW JERSEY CLEAN CITIES COALITION$83,760
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$72,000
DRIVE CLEAN INDIANA$70,580
ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENTS$54,230
WISCONSIN CLEAN CITIES$52,200
PALMETTO CLEAN FUELS COALITION$50,000
ALABAMA CLEAN FUELS COALITION$50,000
HAWKINS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$47,980
MINNESOTA CLEAN CITIES COALITION (MC3)$46,650
Individual grant recipient$43,080
SOUTHEAST FLORIDA CLEAN CITIES$40,000
EAST BAY CLEAN CITIES COALITION$37,283
GREATER WASHINGTON REGION CLEAN CITIES COALITION$36,520
DRIVE ELECTRIC ARIZONA$33,320
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 22% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WASTE MANAGEMENT: $194k → 4%Clarksville-Montgomery County Schools: $117k → 11%CLEAN SWEEP INC: $68k → 12%Rye Engineering PLC: $17k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $103k → 14%FEDEX EXPRESS: $45k → 17%WEAKLEY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $40k → 18%BLEDSOE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $13k → 23%WASTE MANAGEMENT: $167k → 4%CLARKSVILLE-MONTGOMERY CITY: $105k → 11%CLEAN SWEEP INC: $24k → 12%WASTE MANAGEMENT: $44k → 4%CLARKSVILLE-MONTGOMERY CITY: $55k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 33 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
22

Total granted

$3.7M
$1.2M

Still filing today

3%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CLEAN FUELS OHIO
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue -85% · 30% of their budget
  • WM
    WASTE MANAGEMENT
    3× · 2018–2020 · $405k
  • HC
    HAWKINS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $189k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MEMPHIS
    one grant, 2022 · $205k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $144k
  • DD
    DERBY DISTRIBUTION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $133k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
—
2
Transportation Energy Partnership

Conduct research data capture and analysis deliver education training and outreach related to alternative fuel and advanced technology vehicles for the purpose of displacing petroleum consumption reducing vehicle emissions and…

—
3
Virginia Clean Cities

Advance air quality improvement, economic opportunity, and energy security through deployment of alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure, education programs and other petroleum reduction activities. a volunteer board with staff as…

—
4
Utah Clean Cities

Please see schedule o to advance the energy, economic, and environmental security of the united states by supporting local decisions to adopt practices that reduce the use of petroleum in the transportation sector.

Education
5
Clean Energy Districts of Iowa

The purpose of this corporation is to enable and support leadership and the general public in implementing and accelerating the locally-owned, clean, efficient and fair energy transition.

Environment
6
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
7
St Louis Regional Clean Cities

To advance the nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by supporting local decisions to adopt practices that contribute to the reduction of petroleum consumption. clean cities carries out this mission through a network of…

Environment
8
Partnership for Clean Transportation Inc

The partnership for clean transportation, inc. is dedicated to educate the general public and policy-makers about the environmental and energy security benefits of, and support the use of, alternative fuels.

—
9
Clean Fuels Michigan

To accelerate the transition to clean transportation in michigan. we advocate for the suite of alternative fuels including biofuels, hydrogen, propane, natural gas, and electric vehicles.

Community Improvement
10
Northern Colorado Clean Cities

?Northern Colorado Clean Cities NCCC is a 501c3 organization sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's Clean Cities Program. As part of the DOE's Vehicle Technologies Program Clean Cities advances the nation's economic environmental and…

—
11
Clean Fuels Development Coalition

The clean fuels development coalition was formed in 1988 in operation to bring together industry, government, and all interested parties to promote and support the use of clean burning alternative transportation fuels like renewable…

—
12
Pittsburgh Region Clean Citiesinc

Increase the use of alternative fuel vehicles

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clean Fuels Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Land of Sky Regional Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASTE MANAGEMENT: $404,942 · OtherWASTE MANAGEMENTCITY OF MEMPHIS: $205,000 · OtherHAWKINS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $189,000 · OtherCLARKSVILLE-MONTGOMERY CITY: $159,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $144,000 · OtherDERBY DISTRIBUTION INC: $132,600 · Other+64 more: $2,736,224 · Other+64 moreCLEAN FUELS OHIO: $1,490,901 · EnvironmentCLEAN FUELS OHIODRIVE CLEAN INDIANA INC: $70,580 · Environment+8 more: $232,315 · Environment+8 moreFRIENDS OF THE LAND OF SKY REGIONAL COUNCIL INC: $21,875 · Public Benefit
Other$3,971,366Environment$1,793,796Public Benefit$21,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEAN FUELS OHIO: $1,490,901 over 5y, 30% of budgetTRANSPORTATION ENERGY PARTNERSHIP NJ CLEAN CITIES COALITION: $83,760 over 1y, 24% of budgetWisconsin Clean Cities - Southeast Area Inc: $52,200 over 1y, 22% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON REGION CLEAN CITIES COALITION: $36,520 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LAND OF SKY REGIONAL COUNCIL INC: $21,875 over 1y, 26% of budgetDRIVE CLEAN COLORADO: $19,350 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYELLOWSTONE-TETON CLEAN ENERGY COALITION: $17,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLOUISIANA CLEAN FUELS INC: $10,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEAN FUELS OHIO ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPORTATION ENERGY PARTNERSHIP NJ CLEAN CITIES COALITION ↗
  • Who funds DRIVE CLEAN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Wisconsin Clean Cities - Southeast Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA CLEAN FUELS COALITION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Live Green Connecticut Inc: 28% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition?

Find your warmest path to East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on East Tennessee Clean Fuels Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph