· Private foundation
East Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of EAST CAMBRIDGE SAVINGS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADOLESCENT CONSULTATION SERVICES | $10,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE CAMPING ASSOCIATION | $7,500 |
| CAMBRIDGE YMCA - YOUTH AT RISK FITNESS PROGRAM | $7,500 |
| YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON NORTH SUBURBANYMCA | $5,000 |
| GREENROOTS INC | $5,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE OF PORTUGUESE SPEAKERS | $5,000 |
| ARLINGTON EATS | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOMERVILLE | $5,000 |
| MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR BELMONT EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| EAST END HOUSE | $2,500 |
| CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
| CHELSEA ROTARY CLUB | $2,000 |
| BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY - FATO | $2,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - BOSTO | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CYCAMBRIDGE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +21%
- MVMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC6× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +79%
- HRHOMEOWNER'S REHAB INC3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $123k
- UBUMASS BOSTONone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CCCOMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL OF CAMBRIDGEone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Lexington Interfaith Outreach Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEOWNER'S REHAB INC ↗
- Who funds GREENROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON EATS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds ADOLESCENT CONSULTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD APARTMENT HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOMERVILLE-CAMBRIDGE ELDER SERVICES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS ASSISTED LIVING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOMERVILLE COMMUNITY CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COOKS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES HOMEWARD INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Cambridge Community Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Leader Bank Charitable Foundation Corporation · Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization East Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
- Bridges Homeward Inc — 77% of income from government
- Community Action Agency of Somerville — 49% of income from government
- Chelsea Restoration — 44% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Solutions at Work Inc — 20% of income from government
- Just-a-Start Corporation — 16% of income from government
- Cambridge Camping Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Housing Families Inc — 12% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Watch Inc — 9% of income from government
- Cambridge Community Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Bread of Life Inc — 6% of income from government
- Arlington Eats Inc — 6% of income from government
- Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers Inc — 4% of income from government
- East End House Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Neighborhood Developers Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Fisher College — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mcphs University — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- The Somerville Community Corporation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Suffolk University — 1% of income from government
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lesley University — 1% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to East Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to East Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.