· Public charity
Early Learning Property Management Inc
To transform early childhood development in underserved communities by building and maintaining high quality, safe facilities and enhancing existing centers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $220k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW ERA LEARNING CENTER | $102,668 |
| JAMBOREE EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $87,083 |
| PRIDE & JOY DAYCARE CENTER | $84,589 |
| BRIGHT BEGINNING EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $82,072 |
| RIVER OAKES DAY CARE | $81,002 |
| KID'S TIME EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $79,995 |
| THE APPLETON EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $77,730 |
| Individual grant recipient | $77,565 |
| EDUCATION STATION CHILDREN'S CORPORATION | $76,026 |
| ICARE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $67,457 |
| CATERPILLAR CLUBHOUSE | $67,323 |
| EARLY JOURNEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $65,408 |
| LA KIDS ACADEMY | $64,974 |
| INSPIRATION STATION ACADEMY | $63,454 |
| OPEN ARMS LUTHERAN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF BUCKHEAD | $62,964 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLOVING CARE DAYCARE CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $212k
- RORIVER OAKES DAY CARE2× · 2023–2024 · $161k
- ESEDUCATION STATION CHILDRENS CORPORATION2× · 2022–2024 · $151k
Funded once
- 1S1ST STEP LEARNING ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $88k
- GCGATE CITY DAY NURSERYone grant, 2022 · $76k · revenue -17%
- KPKARTER PREPARATORY ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $64k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Giggles & grace early learning center, inc., with community, parents and teachers, is committed to providing a safe, nurturing christian environment emphasizing the total development of each child; spiritual, intellectual, emotional,…
Children at-promise elc has been a trusted leader in early childhood education and childcare for the past 20 years. we serve infants, toddlers, preschool, pre k. our mission at children at-promise is to daily surround your child in a safe,…
Metrokids Preschool is a dynamic new school in St. Paul. We provide the highest quality preschool education, distinguished daycare amenities, and professional services for children in a warm, nurturing, and responsive environment. We are…
Committed to providing every child with a high quality program and a secure environment that will allow them the opportunity to explore and foster their own growth potential. We will work to develop a life-long love of learning in all…
In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.
providing childcare service.
Monarch Preschool offers a unique play-based learning experience for your child. Play-based, child-led education supports social and emotional development, strengthens language and numeracy skills, and inspires a life-long love of learning.
The general philosophy of Northpoint Cooperative Preschool is that we all learn together - adults and children alike. Guided by our qualified, caring, and endlessly imaginative teachers, co-op parents create an environment of learning and…
Provide christian preschool for children ages 2 years 6 months through age 5
Enhance children education
Educate the future leaders of the world through a play-based curriculum
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gate City Day Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Premier Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDUCATION STATION CHILDRENS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NW Youth Power Early Learning ↗
- Who funds GATE CITY DAY NURSERY ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS LUTHERAN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ATLANTA ↗
- Who funds PREMIER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361) ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals North Georgia Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Early Learning Property Management Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.