Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl W and Hildagunda a Brinkman Private Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.0MHealth$707kArts & Culture$677kHuman Services$358kFood & Nutrition$355kRecreation & Sports$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$52kAnimals$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.8M
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$1,100,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000,000
GIBBES ART MUSEUM$500,000
ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
ARETHUSA FARMS FOUNDATION$330,000
SOUTHBURY WOMEN'S CLUB$330,000
LCCESA$100,000
MT ABRAM SKI CLUB$50,000
ANDROSCOGGIN HOME HEALTH SERVICE$30,000
DIRT ROAD DAIRY FARM$20,000
MAINE MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
BENT OF THE RIVER AUDUBON CENTER$10,000
ROCHESTER INSTUTUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KATE GLEASON COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING BRINK$10,000
CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $10k → 9%CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $4k → 9%CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $4k → 9%CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $3k → 9%CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 26 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$4.0M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+39%

Still filing today

42%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fairfield University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +63%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +61%
  • MA
    MT ABRAM SKI CLUB
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +284% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +112%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
10
St Peter's Health Partners

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester Regional Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Begin Again Horse Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairfield University: $1,630,500 · EducationFairfield UniversityRochester Institute of Technology: $1,214,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology+1 more: $10,000 · EducationGIBBES ART MUSEUM: $510,000 · OtherGIBBES ART MUSEUMARETHUSA FARMS FOUNDATION: $330,000 · OtherARETHUSA FARMS FOUNDATIONSOUTHBURY WOMEN'S CLUB: $330,000 · OtherSOUTHBURY WOMEN'S CLUBBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION IN…LCCESA: $103,000 · OtherLCCESAROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Other+24 more: $261,356 · Other+24 moreROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500,000 · HealthROCHESTER RE…Androscoggin Home Health Services Inc: $30,000 · HealthTHE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · HealthMaineHealth: $20,000 · HealthMT ABRAM SKI CLUB: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsCLIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $38,267 · Public Safety & DisasterSOUTHBURY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $800 · Human ServicesBEGIN AGAIN HORSE RESCUE INC: $17,000 · Animals
Education$2,854,500Other$1,739,356Health$577,000Recreation & Sports$70,000Public Safety & Disaster$39,767Human Services$29,800Animals$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairfield University: $1,630,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $1,214,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMT ABRAM SKI CLUB: $70,000 over 7y, 40% of budgetCLIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $38,267 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetAndroscoggin Home Health Services Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC: $24,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMaineHealth: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEGIN AGAIN HORSE RESCUE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHBURY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MT ABRAM SKI CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CLIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Androscoggin Home Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR BETHLEHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MaineHealth ↗
  • Who funds BEGIN AGAIN HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHBURY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl W and Hildagunda a Brinkman Private Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl W and Hildagunda a Brinkman Private Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Earl W and Hildagunda a Brinkman Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph