Skip to content
Earl C and Elizabeth Toutz Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Earl C and Elizabeth Toutz Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.4MReligion$331kEducation$191kHuman Services$149k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$17,230
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO)$34,280
JASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOC$20,800
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN$20,250
JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$19,100
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH--WEBB CITY$18,500
CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$17,750
KVC BEHAVIORIAL HEALTHCARE MO INC$17,230
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$17,100
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$17,050
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$16,150
HEARTSPRING$16,133
COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS$16,000
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOC$14,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $39k → 14%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $27k → 5%HEARTSPRING: $26k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $34k → 14%JASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOC: $21k → 15%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23k → 15%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $26k → 15%GREAT CIRCLE: $21k → 16%CSS EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $26k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $40k → 21%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $31k → 13%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $23k → 12%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $21k → 14%HEARTSPRING: $21k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $32k → 14%JASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOC: $21k → 15%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $19k → 15%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $26k → 15%GREAT CIRCLE: $20k → 16%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH--WEBB CITY: $24k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $34k → 21%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $22k → 12%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $25k → 15%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH--WEBB CITY: $21k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $34k → 21%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $20k → 12%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $22k → 15%CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $20k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $31k → 21%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $19k → 12%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $21k → 15%CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $20k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $29k → 21%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $19k → 15%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN MO: $21k → 21%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $20k → 21%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $31k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $30k → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $24k → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $22k → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $21k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $21k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $20k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $20k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $20k → 18%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $20k → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $19k → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $19k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
RI
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 17 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$42k

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    8× · 2018–2025 · $174k · revenue +41%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $165k · revenue +45%
  • JA
    JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $158k · revenue +116% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • CE
    CSS EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
  • MD
    MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
7
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
8
Hospital for Special Care

Hospital for Special Care is a 236-Bed Rehabilitation and Chronic Disease hospital, serving patients in these primary areas: Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation.

Health
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
The Center for Discovery Inc

The center for discovery offers individuals with a range of disabilities and medical frailties - and their families - innovative educational, clinical, residential, social and creative arts experiences designed to enrich their lives…

Health
11
Madison County Community Hospital

Madison health's vision is to provide exceptional healthcare in a respectful, compassionate, and healing environment.

Health
12
Genesis Health Inc

To advance health and well-being of persons requiring rehabilitation through superior outcomes, service, education and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartspring Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO): $210,358 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN (MO)FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLIN: $178,940 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JOPLINJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $158,159 · OtherJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLINDFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH--WEBB CITY: $152,363 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH--WEBB CITYGREAT CIRCLE: $107,331 · OtherGREAT CIRCLECEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $89,307 · OtherCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $84,927 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $73,637 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENJASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $41,500 · Other+3 more: $76,668 · Other+3 moreThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $173,997 · HealthThe Children's Mercy HospitalNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $153,638 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $152,009 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCHEARTSPRING INC: $146,561 · HealthHEARTSPRING INCMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $95,532 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $47,321 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $165,218 · Education
Other$1,173,190Health$769,058Education$165,218

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $173,997 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $165,218 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $158,159 over 8y, 34% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $153,638 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $152,009 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTSPRING INC: $146,561 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $107,331 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $95,532 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $89,307 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $47,321 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $41,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY SHELTERED FACILITIES ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl C and Elizabeth Toutz Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl C and Elizabeth Toutz Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl C and Elizabeth Toutz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home