Skip to content
E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$130kEducation$110kFood & Nutrition$103kHealth$96kEnvironment$86kArts & Culture$66kScience & Tech$53kYouth Development$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA$10,000
PLYMOUTH PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PLYMOUTH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PLYMOUTH TASK FORCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$7,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLYMOUTH$6,000
MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS$5,000
WILDLANDS TRUST INC$5,000
PLYMOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION$5,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
BLACK FEATHER HORSE RESCUE$5,000
NEIGHBORWORKS HOUSING SOLUTIONS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $3k → 8%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $2k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $2k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 48%.

E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trusteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$704k · 30 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
40

Total granted

$704k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+43%

Still filing today

73%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Plymouth Public Library Corporation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $69k · revenue +46%
  • Feeding America
    8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +84%
  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • GREEN AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • JG
    JOSHUA GLYNN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -76%
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +275%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
43/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF SOUTHEASTERN MASS: $45,000 · OtherHOUSING SOLUTIONS OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSHabitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth: $40,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of Greater PlymouthBLACK FEATHER HORSE RESCUE: $38,500 · OtherBLACK FEATHER HORSE RESCUEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherTALKING INFORMATION CENTER INC: $15,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH TASKFORCE TO END HOMELESSNESS I: $22,000 · OtherPRISON BOOK PROGRAM: $16,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLYMOUTH: $21,000 · Other+40 more: $218,600 · Other+40 morePlymouth Public Library Corporation: $69,000 · EducationPlymouth Public …THE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE MR HOLLAND'S…THE PLYMOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE PLYMOUTH EDU…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDA…+1 more: $3,000 · EducationFeeding America: $68,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Amer…FARM AID INC: $32,000 · Food & NutritionFARM AID INCALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $33,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $3,000 · HealthTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $3,000 · HealthWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $27,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $9,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE HARBORSAVE THE BAY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentMANOMET INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Forests: $3,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $3,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $50,000 · Science & TechTHE NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $3,000 · Public Benefit
Other$436,100Education$125,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Health$62,500Environment$58,000Science & Tech$50,000Public Benefit$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlymouth Public Library Corporation: $69,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetFeeding America: $68,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth: $40,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFARM AID INC: $32,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLYMOUTH TASKFORCE TO END HOMELESSNESS I: $22,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLYMOUTH: $21,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PLYMOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetPRISON BOOK PROGRAM: $16,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTALKING INFORMATION CENTER INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOSHUA GLYNN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE HARBORSAVE THE BAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH SHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANOMET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Navigator: $4,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternet Archive: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Forests: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Rockland Trust Charit…Arbella Insurance Fou…Gardinor-Prunaret Fou…Henry Hornblower Fund…North Easton Savings …American Tower Corpor…Lincoln Financial Fou…Boston Foundation IncVerizon FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
Eastern Bank FoundationMA25.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Gardinor-Prunaret Foundation · Henry Hornblower Fund Inc · North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Farm Aid Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth: 100% of income from government
  • Talking Information Center Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • New England Innocence Project: 12% of income from government
  • Manomet Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Wildlands Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Joseph Evans Charitable Trust Janet Alfieri Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home