· Private foundation
Dyc Foundation Inc
To foster hope for disadvantaged youth who have faced significant hardship as well as underserved communities in order to empower the next generation of community and global leaders.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| SOONG SIL SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| MARYLAND FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH | $6,500 |
| LIFE MISSION | $3,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD | $3,000 |
| SOUTHERN ASIAN BIBLE COLLEGE | $1,990 |
| AMERICA WHEAT MISSION INC | $1,500 |
| CELESTINA | $1,392 |
| GLOBAL COOPERATIVE FOR ADVANCEMENT | $1,200 |
| MISSION PARTNERS USA | $1,000 |
| UNICEF USA | $1,000 |
| WORLD VISION | $1,000 |
| TEACH BEYOND | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 37% of grant dollars ($184k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 63% that went abroad ($311k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 63% of all-years giving ($311k)
4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 26% of Dyc Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 3%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AWAMERICA WHEAT MISSION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue ×16 · 27% of their budget
- 1P12 PLUS6× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +232%
- TGTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- EMEDUCATIONAL MISSION IN MALAWIgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +37%
- CQCOME QUICKLY MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $6k
- GMGMC MISSIONone grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…
International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…
Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
Bright Vision Orphan Care exists to help meet the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of orphans and vulnerable children in the village of Chamadenga in Malawi, Africa through the love of Jesus Christ.
The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…
We are a ministry of servants that lead souls to Jesus Christ and leave a lasting impact on the world for Gods glory. Our vision is to save the people of the USA, Amazon and the World with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and disciple them into…
To prepare emerging leaders to initiate,develop and sustain christian-based youth development organizations and to seed their new ministries as they serve vulnerable children and teens in our world's most under-resourced communities.
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICA WHEAT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds 12 PLUS ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL MISSION IN MALAWI ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Little Lights Urban Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds LOVE A CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds HARVEST CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Dyc Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dyc Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
- Love a Child Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dyc Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Dyc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Dyc’s filings →