Skip to content
Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$146kHealth$119kArts & Culture$117kHuman Services$77kCivil Rights$53kHousing & Shelter$49kInternational$48kAnimals$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $109k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELON UNIVERSITY$25,000
TERRA FIRMA RAINWATER COLLECTIVE$10,000
DREAMZ WORK$10,000
SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM$7,500
PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC$7,500
ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL$7,500
CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC$7,500
POLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY$7,500
ROGUE VALLEY FOOD SYSTEM NETWORK$7,500
STRENGTHENING HEALTH INSTITUTE$7,500
YOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON$6,000
BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC$3,000
ROGUE VALLEY FOUNDATION$3,000
XCAPE DANCE COMPANY$3,000
MASLOW PROJECT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $4k → 11%DREAMZ WORK: $10k → 13%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $8k → 13%SHILOH HOME INC: $5k → 7%BREAK THE SILENCE AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $3k → 9%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $3k → 14%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $3k → 11%DREAMZ WORK: $10k → 13%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $3k → 14%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $3k → 11%DREAMZ WORK: $10k → 13%TRI LAKES CARES: $3k → 9%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2k → 14%2000 FEET INC: $3k → 16%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $3k → 11%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1k → 14%2000 FEET INC: $3k → 16%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $3k → 11%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1k → 14%2000 FEET INC: $750 → 16%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $3k → 11%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $2k → 11%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $2k → 11%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $2k → 11%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5k → 10%DREAMZ WORK: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$845k · 53 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
26

Total granted

$845k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+1%

Still filing today

92%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Elon University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +18%
  • TF
    TERRA FIRMA RAINWATER COLLECTIVE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +17%
  • DW
    DREAMZ WORK INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • HC
    HILL CITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • SF
    SPARKS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +132%
  • BELONG Partners
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
2
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
3
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
4
Feral Cat SpayNeuter Project

Our mission is to save the lives of homeless cats by providing access to high volume spay/neuter surgery in a safe and humane environment, collaborating with others and mentoring like-minded organizations to increase spay/neuter in their…

Animals
5
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
6
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
7
The Dove Project

The dove project is a domestic violence and sexual assault agency that provides survivor services, prevention education and community programming in an effort to reduce interpersonal harm.

Crime & Legal
8
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance

Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…

Animals
9
Rethink Priorities

Rethink Priorities' mission is to support organizations, researchers, and changemakers in efforts to generate the most significant possible charitable impact for others in the present and the long-term future.

Human Services
10
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
11
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
12
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Xcape Dance Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/79
Grantees still filing
48/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Elon University: $90,000 · EducationElon UniversityKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $33,500 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERS…ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL: $14,500 · EducationROGUE VALLEY FARM TO…THE MALALA FUND: $12,000 · EducationTHE MALALA FUNDTRANSLATE GENDER INC: $6,000 · Education+3 more: $11,500 · Education+3 moreYOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON: $41,000 · OtherYOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGONROGUE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherROGUE VALLEY FOUNDATIONEVON'S HOPE: $37,500 · OtherEVON'S HOPEUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $19,000 · OtherCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $15,000 · OtherMASLOW PROJECT: $18,500 · OtherCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $14,500 · OtherSylvia Rivera Law Project Inc: $16,000 · OtherPROJECT POOCH: $14,000 · OtherJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $17,500 · Other+43 more: $172,900 · Other+43 moreDREAMZ WORK INCORPORATED: $37,500 · Human ServicesDREAMZ WORK INC…BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesBUTTERFLY HAVEN…GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE FOR…THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $9,500 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTE…RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesRECREATIONAL AV…PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIPS IN…2000 FEET INC: $6,250 · Human ServicesSHILOH HOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPDX DIAPER BANK: $4,500 · Human Services+3 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGOLISANO …SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $22,500 · Arts & CultureSCIENCEWO…NO MANS LAND FILM FESTIVAL: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNO MANS L…TALENT MAKER CITY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTALENT MA…XCAPE DANCE COMPANY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureXCAPE DAN…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSTRENGTHENING HEALTH INSTITUTE: $70,000 · Food & NutritionSTRENGTHE…KANBE'S MARKETS: $7,500 · Food & NutritionKANBE'S M…TERRA FIRMA RAINWATER COLLECTIVE: $37,500 · EnvironmentPOLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY: $9,500 · EnvironmentNick Wilson Charitable Group: $20,500 · HealthROGUE RETREAT: $19,000 · HealthGARDNERS HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $2,250 · Health
Education$167,500Other$391,900Human Services$128,750Arts & Culture$80,500Food & Nutrition$77,500Environment$47,000Health$46,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetElon University: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTRENGTHENING HEALTH INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 9y, 35% of budgetYOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON: $41,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTERRA FIRMA RAINWATER COLLECTIVE: $37,500 over 4y, 23% of budgetEVON'S HOPE: $37,500 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetDREAMZ WORK INCORPORATED: $37,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $33,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBUTTERFLY HAVEN INC: $24,000 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetSCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $22,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNick Wilson Charitable Group: $20,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNO MANS LAND FILM FESTIVAL: $20,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE RETREAT: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT: $18,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSylvia Rivera Law Project Inc: $16,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL: $14,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT POOCH: $14,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY: $9,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANBE'S MARKETS: $7,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budget2000 FEET INC: $6,250 over 3y, 17% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTALENT MAKER CITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRANSLATE GENDER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE INC: $5,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGladstone Cheerleading: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARDNERS HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSPARKS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBELONG Partners: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetXCAPE DANCE COMPANY: $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHILOH HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Elon University ↗
  • Who funds STRENGTHENING HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
  • Who funds TERRA FIRMA RAINWATER COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds EVON'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds DREAMZ WORK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Nick Wilson Charitable Group ↗
  • Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NO MANS LAND FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE RETREAT ↗
  • Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sylvia Rivera Law Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAT ADOPTION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT POOCH ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MALALA FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds POLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FOOD SYSTEM NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds KANBE'S MARKETS ↗
  • Who funds 2000 FEET INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TALENT MAKER CITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Carpenter Foundat…The Autzen FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Carrico Family Founda…The Collins FoundationQuinn Hill FoundationJoe & Frances Naumes …Raymond Family Founda…The Ford Family Found…The Roundhouse Founda…The Larson Legacy
The Oregon Community FoundationOR30.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Carrico Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Quinn Hill Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · Raymond Family Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Larson Legacy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Dreamz Work Incorporated: 100% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Rogue Valley Farm to School: 17% of income from government
  • Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
  • New Haven Reads Community Book Bank Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat: 12% of income from government
  • Youth Symphony of Southern Oregon: 6% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children-Portland: 5% of income from government
  • Justice Dance Performance Project Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pdx Diaper Bank: 2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Scienceworks Hands-On Museum: 0% of income from government
  • Casa of Jackson County Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dunlap Silsby Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dunlap Silsby Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home