Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duneland Health Council

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$237k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$454kEducation$194kHuman Services$185kCrime & Legal$184kReligion$169kHousing & Shelter$153kYouth Development$95kFood & Nutrition$78kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $216k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$40,000
SALVATION ARMY$26,600
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST$24,000
IVY TECH FOUNDATION$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MICHIGAN CITY$20,000
STEPPING STONE SHELTER$20,000
DUNEBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERS$16,418
INTREPID PHOENIX$12,000
THE LUBEZNIK CENTER$12,000
MICHIGAN CITY FIREPOLICE DEPARTMENT$8,789
Individual grant recipient$7,500
SACRED HEART FOOD PANTRY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS: $25k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS: $13k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS: $12k → 15%FAMILY ADVOCATES: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 23 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$1.7M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+14%

Still filing today

48%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DUNEBROOK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $163k · revenue +68%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +273%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • MC
    MICHIGAN CITY PARK AND RECREATION DEPT
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • AH
    ADOLESCENT HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
  • HF
    HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
—
2
Laporte County Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meals for shut-ins or indigent individuals of the community. volunteers deliver to clients monday thru friday.

—
3
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
4
Independent Living Inc

To establish places of residence for adults who are developmentally disabled so as to enable them to have available an environment which is condusive to their becoming and remaining productive members in society.

—
5
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc

0

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
7
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
8
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
9
Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc

The staff and volunteers of Catholic Charities Indianapolis are called by the Gospel to uphold the dignity of all people. Guided by Catholic social teaching, we consider it a privilege to deliver compassionate and caring service to help…

—
10
Healthy Communities of Laporte County Inc
—
11
Indiana Health Information Exchange Inc

Through information exchange, we improve health and healthcare.

Health
12
Mid-Land Meals Inc

To plan, coordinate, and provide meals and nutritional services primarily for the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals in the state of Indiana.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ivy Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Foundation of La Porte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $208,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $183,899 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUNEBROOK INC: $163,418 · OtherDUNEBROOK INCSALVATION ARMY: $138,230 · OtherSALVATION ARMYPURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST: $117,500 · OtherPURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWESTTHE LUBEZNIK CENTER: $79,000 · OtherTHE LUBEZNIK CENTERSTEPPING STONE SHELTER: $75,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONE SHELTERREINS OF LIFE INC: $54,999 · OtherSOCIAL & LEARNING INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · OtherMICHIGAN CITY PARK AND RECREATION DEPT: $50,000 · Other+20 more: $258,134 · Other+20 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $114,998 · Youth DevelopmentIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $113,834 · EducationTHE INTREPID PHOENIX INC: $76,167 · Recreation & SportsMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $59,250 · Food & NutritionTannehill Community Soup Kitchen: $5,000 · Food & NutritionINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $49,167 · Human ServicesFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $45,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,378,680Youth Development$114,998Education$113,834Recreation & Sports$76,167Food & Nutrition$64,250Human Services$56,667Housing & Shelter$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $163,418 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $114,998 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $113,834 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTREPID PHOENIX INC: $76,167 over 6y, 20% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $59,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $54,999 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSOCIAL & LEARNING INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $49,167 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $14,950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE INC: $12,728 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetService League of Michigan City IN Inc: $8,500 over 2y, 21% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTannehill Community Soup Kitchen: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID PHOENIX INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL & LEARNING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Service League of Michigan City IN Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tannehill Community Soup Kitchen ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Unity Foundation of la Porte CountyIN24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Unity Foundation of la Porte County · Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation · Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Br Foundation · United Way of Greater Laporte County Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · Leonard J and Irene Brown Foundation Inc · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duneland Health Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duneland Health Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Duneland Health Council?

    Find your warmest path to Duneland Health Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duneland Health Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph