Skip to content
Dujay Charitable Foundation 1554-1115004378 at a glance

· Private foundation

Dujay Charitable Foundation 1554-1115004378

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$345k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$509kInternational$394kHealth$365kHuman Services$210kCivil Rights$18kCrime & Legal$15kRecreation & Sports$10kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
$115,093
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$115,093
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVC$115,093
BAPTIST HOSPITALS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$100,000
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE PROGRAM$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $113k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $109k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $89k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $83k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$1.2M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+21%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $509k · revenue +13%
  • BI
    BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $394k · revenue +157%
  • JR
    Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program
    5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • LB
    LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTERS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • CH
    CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
2
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
3
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
How Center

The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.

—
6
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
8
Lake Pointe Operating Company Llc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Southeast Texas Hospice Foundation

Provide support for southeast texas hospice inc, a non-profit organization providing hospice services for the southeast texas area

—
10
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Pregnancy Care Center of Southeast Texas

Confidential pregnancy testing; counseling in pregnancy options; classes in prenatal care, parenting and job skills; referrals; providing baby items and clothing.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Birthright of Beaumont. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $508,800 · OtherSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INCBUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVC: $115,093 · OtherBUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST: $87,555 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEASTLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTERS: $50,000 · OtherLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTERSSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF SE TX: $45,000 · OtherCHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+5 more: $46,320 · OtherBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $393,707 · Human ServicesBUCKNER INTERNATIONALJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $125,446 · HealthJulie Rogers Gif…Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas: $100,000 · HealthBaptist Hospital…SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAnayat House Inc: $9,468 · Housing & Shelter
Other$892,768Human Services$393,707Health$225,446Recreation & Sports$10,000Housing & Shelter$9,468

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $508,800 over 5y, 13% of budgetBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $393,707 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $125,446 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $14,750 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnayat House Inc: $9,468 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF BEAUMONT: $7,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF BEAUMONT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
Mechia FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dujay Charitable Foundation 1554-1115004378 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dujay Charitable Foundation 1554-1115004378. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dujay Charitable Foundation 1554-1115004378’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home