Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$67kPhilanthropy$17kEducation$17kInternational$16kHealth$12kRecreation & Sports$11kPublic Benefit$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$420k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LORENZ CHURCH$14,171
KETTERING UNIVERSITY$2,000
FRANKENMUTH INTERNATIONAL AID FOUND$1,200
SAGINAW HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,200
CROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES$1,200
CAMP LU LAY LEA$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 12 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$126k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
-47%

Still filing today

17%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LORENZ CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k
  • FY
    FRANKENMUTH YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue -47%
  • CO
    CITY OF FRANKENMUTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • BF
    BETHANY FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fredericksburg United Methodist Church Foundation Inc

To extend and fulfill the mission and ministry of the fredericksburg united methodist church and/or the united methodist church in accordance with the discipline, doctrine, worship and service of the united methodist church.

Religion
2
Central Michigan University Research Corporation

To receive, administer, and distribute funds to promote and encourage research, scholarship, creative activities, and other applied research and technology at CMU.

Education
3
Frankenmuth Farmers Market

To create the exchange of local products and information between growers, producers, and consumers by: supplying fresh local products and goods, educating growers, producers and consumers, keeping our rural heritage alive, inspiring…

Food & Nutrition
4
Franklin County Historical Society

The mission of the Franklin County Historical Society is to preserve and promote the history of Franklin County, Washington through educational publications, programs and the operation of the Franklin County Museum.

—
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Trinity Hospital Twin City

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
7
Corpus Christi First United Methodist Church Foundation Inc

Endowment fund maintained for church purposes

Religion
8
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
9
First Congregational Church of Madison Foundation Inc

Support Christian activities of First Congregational United Church of Christ in Madison, WI and administer dedicated funds such as scholarship bequests.

Religion
10
Chemung County Historical Society Inc

The chemung county historical society seeks to deepen our audience's understanding of the past and the role of histroy in our future. to achieve this, the society uses diverse and evolving collections to engage audiences through…

—
11
Fargo-Moorhead Science Museum

Breaking barriers to ignite the curiosity in all of us.

Arts & Culture
12
Foundation for Mott Community College

The foundation for mott community college is a community based charitable organization whose major purpose is to acquire and distribute resources to the students, faculty, and staff of mott community college, as it contributes to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frankenmuth Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crossroads Counseling Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LORENZ CHURCH: $76,175 · OtherST LORENZ CHURCHBETHANY FELLOWSHIP INC: $10,125 · OtherBETHANY FELLOWSHIP INCCITY OF FRANKENMUTH: $5,975 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherKEYS OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherFRANKENMUTH HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherDELTA COLLEGE: $5,000 · Other+18 more: $33,000 · Other+18 moreTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $17,750 · PhilanthropyTHE FRANKE…COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES: $4,900 · HealthFRANKENMUTH YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsFRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKettering University: $2,000 · EducationCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesHMONG MISSION SOCIETY: $500 · Religion
Other$145,275Philanthropy$17,750Health$9,900Recreation & Sports$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000Education$2,000Human Services$2,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $17,750 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFRANKENMUTH YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES: $4,900 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetKettering University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKENMUTH YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Kettering University ↗
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HMONG MISSION SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · The Frankenmuth Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duane & Dorothy Bierlein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph