Skip to content

· Private foundation

DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$19kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$4kEmployment$3kYouth Development$2kAnimals$2kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Multiple Sclerosis Society$3,500
Nik Wallenda FOundation$2,500
Big Brothers Big Sisters$250
ST Judes Children's Hosp$250
WUSF$250
Wounded Warrior Project$250
Hillsdale$200
Sherriff's Youth Ranch$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Jewish Federation of Sarasota$75
American Heart Association$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $298) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Eagles for Children: $102 → 10%Eagles for Children: $100 → 10%Eagles for Children: $96 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 19 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$31k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+150%

Still filing today

37%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +115%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +126%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MF
    Mitchell Fund
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • OO
    Out of Door Academy
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
4
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
5
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
11
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Star Children's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eagles for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

National Multiple Sclerosis Society: $15,450 · OtherNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNik Wallenda FOundation: $2,500 · OtherNik Wallenda FOundationMitchell Fund: $2,000 · OtherMitchell FundEaster Seals: $1,925 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters: $1,685 · Other+23 more: $8,150 · Other+23 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,850 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $375 · HealthGOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC: $2,050 · EmploymentOPEN BOOKS LTD: $1,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $275 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $200 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesEAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $298 · Human ServicesFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $950 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $450 · International
Other$37,210Health$2,225Employment$2,050Education$1,475Human Services$1,398Arts & Culture$950International$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC: $2,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $298 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVELAND CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds LOVELAND CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER’s filings →

More from the funding graph