Skip to content
Dr Stuart Dittmar and Winifred Dittmar Memor at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr Stuart Dittmar and Winifred Dittmar Memor

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$108kEducation$65kEmployment$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$25k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARLISLE AREA HEALTHCARE AUXILIARY INC$25,000
FULTON COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$11,253
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%WILSON COLLEGE: $40k → 9%FULTON COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 11%CARLISLE AREA HEALTHCARE AUXILIARY INC: $25k → 8%LEAH'S LEGACY: $7k → 9%FULTON COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%CARLISLE AREA HEALTHCARE AUXILIARY INC: $25k → 8%FRANKLIN COUNTY CAREER & TECH: $27k → 9%Rescue Hose Company No 1 of Greencastle: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
2
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
3
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
4
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
5
Upmc Pinnacle Lancaster

Upmc lancaster's mission while in operation as a charitable organization was dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
8
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
9
Upmc Pinnacle

Upmc pinnacle (a.k.a., upmc in central pa.) is a division of upmc. upmc is a world-renowned nonprofit health care provider and insurer with 100,000 employees-including more than 5,000 physicians-caring for patients across more than 40…

Health
10
Upmc Muncy

Muncy Valley Hospital is a subsidiary of the exempt entity UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through…

Health
11
Roane County Medical Center

Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upmc Pinnacle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Leahs Legacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARLISLE AREA HEALTHCARE AUXILIARY: $50,000 · HealthCARLISLE AREA HEALTHCARE AUXILIARYUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATIONFulton County Medical Center: $14,770 · HealthFulton County Medical CenterFulton County Med Ctr Foundation: $11,253 · HealthFulton County Med Ctr FoundationWILSON COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationWILSON COLLEGESHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI…FRANKLIN COUNTY CAREER & TECH: $27,000 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY CAREER …AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSLEAHS LEGACY: $6,500 · PhilanthropyRESCUE HOSE COMPANY NO 1 OF GREENCASTLE PA: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$101,023Education$65,000Other$47,000Philanthropy$6,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILSON COLLEGE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFulton County Medical Center: $14,770 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFulton County Med Ctr Foundation: $11,253 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEAHS LEGACY: $6,500 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetRESCUE HOSE COMPANY NO 1 OF GREENCASTLE PA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Stuart Dittmar and Winifred Dittmar Memor funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Stuart Dittmar and Winifred Dittmar Memor. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr Stuart Dittmar and Winifred Dittmar Memor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home