How much did DR KENT ROBERTS & ILENE ROBERTS grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of DR KENT ROBERTS & ILENE ROBERTS’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

retreatopera

2020

health

2021

—

2022

opera

2023

shelter

2024

—

2025

expendituresheart

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k41 grants · $184k
$10k–50k18 grants · $213k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

WILD WEST WILDLIFE REHABILITATION C$20,000
AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$20,000
AMARILLO MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$15,000
THE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE$13,000
ACTS COMMUNITY$10,000
ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE$10,000
OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL$10,000
AMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF AM$10,000
WILDCAT BLUFF NATURE CENTER$10,000
AMARILLO SPCA$10,000
FAITH CITY MISSION$10,000
PANHANDLE ADULT REBUILDING CENTER$10,000
THE BRIDGE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $251k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 14%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.8M · 93 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

93 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.8M

$329k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+28%

Still filing today

45%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AS
AMARILLO SYMPHONY
8× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +106%
TH
THE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE
7× · 2018–2025 · $93k · revenue +25%
TB
THE BRIDGE
8× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +40%

Funded once

B
BUCKNER
one grant, 2020 · $20k
HT
HEALTH THE CITY
one grant, 2018 · $20k
AA
ASCENSION ACADEMY
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Christian Homes of Abilene Inc

To change lives and build Christian families through maternity, foster, and adoption services.

Human Services

Amarillo Area Foundation Inc

A community foundation operating as a public charity, with a mission to improve the quality of life in the texas panhandle through effective philanthropic efforts.

Philanthropy

Medical Center League House of

To serve as a home away from home for patients and their families coming to amarillo, texas for health care treatment.

Health

Center City of Amarillo Inc

Use restructuring to bring people to downtown amarillo

Community Improvement

Amarillo Multiservice Center

Organization provides day care for adults

Human Services

Presbyterian Home for Children

Provide a loving home for children from backgrounds of abuse, neglect and trauma.

Human Services

Downtown Amarillo Inc

Downtown amarillo, inc. is committed to making downtown amarillo a vibrant and attractive place.

Community Improvement

Alamo Breast Cancer Foundation

The mission is to end breast cancer by assisting patients, informing health professionals and policymakers, and expanding knowledge through education and community outreach.

Health

Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on ability to pay.

Health

Abilene Zoological Society

To provide an animal-oriented educational/recreational resource for the citizen's of Abilene and surrounding communities in order to promote environmental awareness, conservation, and research.

Animals

Habitat for Humanity Abilene Inc

Construct and/or rehabilitate houses for sale to low- and moderate-income families who qualify for home ownership. Homes are sold for an affordable mortgage.

Housing & Shelter

Abilene Hope Haven Inc

To provide basic needs and services to homeless individuals who are willing to commit to improving their lifestyle.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hope and Healing Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Parc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/66

the rest of the field

81/967

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

58/62

Grantees still filing

47/62

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,151,000Arts & Culture$384,900Human Services$261,000Health$163,000Animals$120,000Religion$77,000Civil Rights$52,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX102.3× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mary E Bivins Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries · Kimble Foundation Trust · Mays Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · The Don & Sybil Harrington · Oeschger Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DR KENT ROBERTS & ILENE ROBERTS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PANHANDLE NUC INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814321959 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PANHANDLE NUC INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts?

Find your warmest path to Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DR KENT ROBERTS & ILENE ROBERTS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts?

More from the funding graph

DR KENT ROBERTS & ILENE ROBERTS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts?

More from the funding graph