Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas J and Geneva H Fife Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$77kFood & Nutrition$54kHealth$49kHuman Services$39kHousing & Shelter$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kArts & Culture$20kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$528k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossroads of the West BSA$27,000
Box Elder Community Pantry$4,000
Acts Six Soup Kitchen$4,000
Guide Dogs for the Blind$3,000
Habitat for Humanity$3,000
The American Red Cross$3,000
The Road Home$3,000
National Kidney Foundation$2,000
Huntsman Cancer Foundation$2,000
Adopt-a-Native Elder$2,000
Utah Food Bank$2,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospita$1,000
American Diabetes Association$1,000
Best Friends Animal Society$1,000
Youthlinc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ROAD HOME: $3k → 9%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 9%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 9%UTAH POLICE CIVILLIAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 8%The Road Home: $3k → 8%Adopt-a-Native Elder: $2k → 8%Adopt-a-Native Elder: $2k → 8%Adopt-a-Native Elder: $2k → 8%Adopt-a-Native Elder: $2k → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER: $2k → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER: $2k → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER: $2k → 8%The Road Home: $2k → 8%The Road Home: $2k → 8%The Road Home: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 21 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$306k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-17%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +6%
  • FC
    FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +12%
  • TR
    THE ROAD HOME
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • GS
    Golden Spike Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -79%
  • UP
    UTAH POLICE CIVILIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -17%
  • YF
    YELLOWSTONE FOREVERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +175%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
4
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
5
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
6
Grand Canyon Conservancy

As the official philanthropic and collaborative partner of the grand canyon national park, grand canyon conservancy's mission is to inspire generations of park champions to cherish and support the natural and cultural wonder of the grand…

Environment
7
Utah Zoological Society

Utah's hogle zoo creates champions for wildlife and is our community's gateway to animals, connecting our visitors with the natural world and engaging them in wildlife conservation action locally and worldwide.

Animals
8
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
9
Utah Animal Adoption Center

The organization is dedicated to reducing pet overpopulation, eliminating euthanasia as a means of controlling pet overpopulation, and preventing animal suffering in utah.

Animals
10
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
11
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Forever; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Crossroads of the West BSA: $77,000 · OtherCrossroads of the West BSABOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY: $22,000 · OtherBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $16,500 · OtherFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INCUTAH FOOD BANK: $12,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKUNITED WAY: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · Other+5 more: $18,500 · Other+5 moreGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE…THE ROAD HOME: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOMEAdopt-A-Native Elder: $14,000 · Human ServicesAdopt-A-Native Eld…UTAH POLICE CIVILIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CA…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $7,000 · HealthNational Ki…American Diabetes Association: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Di…Golden Spike Foundation: $20,000 · Arts & CultureACTS SIX SOUP KITCHEN: $17,000 · Food & NutritionTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $9,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $7,500 · AnimalsYOUTHLINC: $7,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · International
Other$183,500Human Services$54,000Health$33,500Arts & Culture$20,000Food & Nutrition$17,000Animals$16,500International$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY: $22,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGolden Spike Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetACTS SIX SOUP KITCHEN: $17,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $16,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHLINC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN UTAH: $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH POLICE CIVILIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds BOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Golden Spike Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ACTS SIX SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHLINC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds UTAH POLICE CIVILIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · United Way of Northern Utah · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas J and Geneva H Fife Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas J and Geneva H Fife Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Douglas J and Geneva H Fife’s filings →

    More from the funding graph