Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Douglas Grymes Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$36kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$7kInternational$5kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$2,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$500
UNCF$500
STAR OF HOPE$500
SEARCH$500
THE WOMEN'S HOME$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$87k · 12 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$87k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +38%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +107%
  • CI
    CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • LL
    LIVING LIFE SOURCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

2
Houston Health Foundation

Houston health foundation (hhf) has the mission of creating private/public partnerships for sustainable health and wellness initiatives and programs in our communities.

Philanthropy
3
Trees of Hope

Trees of hope transforms lives with fundraising and outreach activities for the exclusive benefit of childrens programs at star of hope, houston's largest mission for the homeless.

Housing & Shelter
4
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

5
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
6
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
7
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
8
Community Family Centers Inc

To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.

Human Services
9
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services
10
Ihs the Institute for Human Services Inc

Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.

Housing & Shelter
11
Association House of Chicago

Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…

Human Services
12
New Hope Housing Inc

To provide life-stabilizing, affordable housing and support for people with very limited incomes.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission and the most unlike its peers is Living Life Source Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TH CHAN SCHL PUB HLTH HARVARD COLLG — $22,200 · OtherTH CHAN SCHL PUB HLTH HARVARD COLLGSEARCH — $7,500 · OtherSEARCHThe Houston Food Bank — $7,500 · OtherThe Houston Food BankSAN JOSE CLINIC — $7,000 · OtherSAN JOSE CLINICUNCF — $6,500 · OtherUNCFCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $3,500 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESTH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH — $2,000 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN…STAR OF HOPE MISSION — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF H…Lighthouse For The Blind Of Houston Inc — $5,250 · HealthLighthous…LIVING LIFE SOURCE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthLIVING LI…CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $5,250 · InternationalWORKSHOP HOUSTON — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$56,200Human Services$7,500Housing & Shelter$7,500Health$7,250International$5,250Youth Development$5,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLighthouse For The Blind Of Houston Inc — $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORKSHOP HOUSTON — $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING LIFE SOURCE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds Lighthouse For The Blind Of Houston Inc
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED
  • Who funds WORKSHOP HOUSTON
  • Who funds LIVING LIFE SOURCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Douglas Grymes Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph