Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Douglas C & Lynn M Roberts Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$498kEmployment$419kPhilanthropy$251kHuman Services$70kEducation$35kYouth Development$30kFood & Nutrition$19kCommunity Improvement$10kCivil Rights$9kOther$691k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $212k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY HOUSE$162,000
FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$35,000
CASA DEKALB COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%SAFE PASSAGE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Douglas C & Lynn M Roberts Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Douglas C & Lynn M Roberts Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
40

Total granted

$1.6M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEmploymentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $409k · revenue +50%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +248%
  • KF
    KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA
    6× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • SH
    SYCAMORE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • ET
    EGYPTIAN THEATRE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dekalb History Center

Historical preservation. the organization collects, preserves, and shares the history of dekalb county, georgia. the organization's archives and museum are open to the public for research.

Arts & Culture
2
Dekalb County Community Foundation Inc

The community foundation of dekalb county promotes community philanthropy by offering local citizens the opportunity to create a charitable legacy that will sustain and improve life in our county.

Philanthropy
3
Elder Care Services of Dekalb County Inc

Elder care services of dekalb county, inc. was established to promote and further the welfare of senior citizens and their families who live in dekalb county, through the provision of services which improve their well being and quality of…

Crime & Legal
4
Dekalb County Farm Bureau

To improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life.

5
Dekalb County Economic Development Partnership Inc

Were on a mission to improve the quality of life for the citizens of dekalb county through the responsible growth of business and industry. our vision is to facilitate investment into making dekalb county a premier economic driver in…

Community Improvement
6
Dekalb Community Impact Corporation

Responds to community needs with compassionate, Christ-centered programs and services

Recreation & Sports
7
Dekalb Library Foundation Inc

To support and enhance the dekalb county public library service, including support for literacy programs, children's reading programs, and georgia center for the book.

Education
8
Decatur County Community Foundation Inc

The foundation encourages, prudently manages and distributes charitable contributions to improve the quality of life of decatur county residents, now and in the future.

Philanthropy
9
Decatur Chamber of Commerce

Develop commerce in the city of decatur indiana

10
Douglas County Farm Bureau

Work to improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family

11
Dekalb County Council On Aging Inc

To improve the quality of life of the seniors, disabled persons and others in our community through services and programs that meet their physical, mental, emotional, intellectual and mobile needs.

12
Dekalb County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Prevent/intervene in child abuse situations

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dekalb County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Collaboratory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability Support ServicesCommunity Behavioral Health…Local Economic Development …Southwest Florida Community…Food Pantries & Emergency A…Community Foundations & Gra…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr18%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr18%42%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/32
the rest of the field
15%
6,652/44,659

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $285,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $131,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY I…SYCAMORE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherSYCAMORE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSYCAMORE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $28,100 · Other+43 more — $234,200 · Other+43 moreDeKalb County History Center — $454,849 · Arts & CultureDeKalb County History Cente…COLLABORATORY — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCOLLABORATORY+4 more — $13,055 · Arts & CultureOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC — $409,470 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC+1 more — $10,000 · EmploymentDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $207,500 · PhilanthropyDEKALB COUNTY…CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTE COM…MARION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropyKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA — $60,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PASSAGE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $35,000 · EducationADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$728,300Arts & Culture$497,904Employment$419,470Philanthropy$250,500Human Services$70,000Education$35,000Youth Development$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDeKalb County History Center — $454,849 over 7y, 24% of budgetOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC — $409,470 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $207,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $131,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA — $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSYCAMORE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $18,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY GARDENS — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMARION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA DeKalb County Inc — $9,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMARION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $6,300 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetELMWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE HAVEN OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAY IT FORWARD HOUSE NFP — $4,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThis is My Brave Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dekalb County Community FoundationIL45× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dekalb County Community Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Ideal Industries Foundation · Sycamore Charities Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · George E& Betty Bdutton Foundation · Katz Family Foundation · Horizons Unlimited Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Kishwaukee United Way · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Nebraska Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Douglas C & Lynn M Roberts Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph