Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dorrance Foundation for Education

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$9.6MArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$32kHealth$30kEnvironment$11kReligion$6kScience & Tech$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.6M
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$438,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$438,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$438,000
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$438,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$431,870
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$426,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$12,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$10,000
NAU FOUNDATION$10,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
PHOENIX PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%3rd Decade Inc: $10k → 15%3RD DECADE INC: $10k → 15%3RD DECADE INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
AR
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 66% of Dorrance Foundation for Education’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in AZ; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Dorrance Foundation for Educationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.0M · 16 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
42

Total granted

$7.0M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+7%

Still filing today

69%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    6× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +19%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +125%
  • NA
    NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +366%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • UF
    UA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
8
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tci Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersPublic Library SupportAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Public School District Foun…Pregnancy Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%3%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr12%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr15%1%20–35yr10%1%35–55yr12%98%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/47
the rest of the field
16%
4,465/28,438

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
27/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Arizona Foundation — $2,473,117 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,273,911 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $2,179,015 · EducationNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+14 more — $24,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $890,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY — $878,870 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY — $859,500 · OtherNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY+45 more — $164,703 · Other+45 more3RD DECADE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureMONTPELIER FOUNDATION — $4,470 · Arts & CultureMany Mouths One Stomach — $1,250 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Northern Arizona Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSCOUNDREL AND SCAMP THEATRE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $8,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $15 · HealthDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $4,500 · EnvironmentTransition Zone Horticultural Inst — $4,000 · EnvironmentCOYOTE TASK FORCE INC — $8,000 · Employment
Education$6,950,543Other$2,793,323Human Services$30,000Arts & Culture$16,720Health$13,515Environment$8,500Employment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $2,473,117 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,273,911 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $2,179,015 over 6y, 2.1% of budget3RD DECADE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTCI FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $8,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOYOTE TASK FORCE INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAGE FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONTPELIER FOUNDATION — $4,470 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTransition Zone Horticultural Inst — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPATRONATO SAN XAVIER — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLAGSTAFF ARTS AND LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMany Mouths One Stomach — $1,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMuseum of Northern Arizona Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAW PLACEMENT OF NORTHERN ARIZONA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Education Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMesa Public Schools Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSCOUNDREL AND SCAMP THEATRE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC EDUCATION ARIZONA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHISKERS N WISHES SANCTUARY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA FFA FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEN'S BELLS INC — $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 3RD DECADE INC
  • Who funds TCI FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING
  • Who funds COYOTE TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds PHOENIX PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAGE FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC
  • Who funds ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds MONTPELIER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Transition Zone Horticultural Inst
  • Who funds PATRONATO SAN XAVIER
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF ARTS AND LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ36.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Geofamily Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · American Express Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dorrance Foundation for Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc3% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dorrance Foundation for Education?

Find your warmest path to Dorrance Foundation for Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph