Skip to content
Dorothy R Gauss Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dorothy R Gauss Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$509k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$430k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MYouth Development$523kHuman Services$121k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $430k
$50,958
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY$429,745
MARYHURST$50,958
THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE$16,423
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$11,737
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $45k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $40k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $35k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $20k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $16k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $15k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $15k → 15%THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$1.7M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
    4× · 2021–2024 · $994k · revenue +2%
  • MI
    MARYHURST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $326k · revenue +42%
  • CP
    CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $197k · revenue +99%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $994,232 · EducationBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $66,600 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INCMARYHURST INC: $325,934 · Youth DevelopmentMARYHURST INCCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $196,885 · Human ServicesCABBAGE PATCH…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC: $60,790 · HealthFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $60,000 · Housing & Shelter
    Education$1,060,832Youth Development$325,934Human Services$196,885Health$60,790Housing & Shelter$60,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $994,232 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMARYHURST INC: $325,934 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $196,885 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $66,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC: $60,790 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
    • Who funds MARYHURST INC ↗
    • Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Dorothy R Gauss Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy R Gauss Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Dorothy R Gauss’ filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home