Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy M Tenney Charitable Trust Attn Warren M Yanoff Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$86kFood & Nutrition$18kReligion$16kHealth$13kArts & Culture$13kCivil Rights$12kPublic Benefit$3kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$322k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSI$11,000
BELOIT COLLEGE$7,500
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$3,400
FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM$1,500
IMPACT INC$1,500
WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$1,500
MILFORD DEPT OF EDUCATION$1,500
FRIENDS OF GERIATRIC AUTH OF MILFOR$1,000
ACLU$1,000
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
WORCESTER ART MUSEUM$650
TEMPLE EMANUEL SINAI$600
BOYLSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
MONSIGNOR SCANLON HIGH SCHOOL$500
ONE CAN HELP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 41 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
37

Total granted

$139k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
0%

Still filing today

20%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORCESTER ART MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +80%
  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • A
    AFHU
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • TO
    TOWN OF NORTHBOROUGH
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • WM
    WHY ME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
11
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
12
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Can Help Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BELOIT COLLEGE: $34,500 · OtherBELOIT COLLEGEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSI: $11,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSIAMERICAN FRIEDNS OF HEBREW UNIVERSI: $10,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIEDNS OF HEBREW UNIVERSIDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $7,900 · OtherRACHEL'S TABLE: $7,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+67 more: $65,070 · Other+67 moreWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $5,750 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $300 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $325 · Arts & CultureWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $5,250 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $300 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $250 · Food & NutritionChildren's Hospital Corporation: $2,750 · HealthHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $550 · HealthONE CAN HELP INC: $2,700 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $2,500 · Crime & LegalABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC: $2,400 · Housing & Shelter
Other$155,370Arts & Culture$6,375Food & Nutrition$5,800Health$3,300Youth Development$2,700Crime & Legal$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $5,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $4,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE CAN HELP INC: $2,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $2,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC: $2,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHY ME INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORCESTER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ONE CAN HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds ABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds WHY ME INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy M Tenney Charitable Trust Attn Warren M Yanoff Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy M Tenney Charitable Trust Attn Warren M Yanoff Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Impact Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • One Can Help Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Legal Aid Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Worcester Art Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorothy M Tenney Charitable Trust Attn Warren M Yanoff Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph