Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy M Hamilton & Fred Hamilton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$230kEducation$135kAnimals$64kCrime & Legal$40k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE SUN PEOPLE$25,000
GERARD'S HOUSE$16,941
HALOS HELP AFTER LOSS$12,000
OHOLEI YOSEF YITZCHOK LUBAVITCH$5,000
MANY MOTHERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOUR CHILDREN: $15k → 13%LITTLE SUN PEOPLE: $25k → 20%HOUR CHILDREN: $15k → 13%PRISON WRITES: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 10 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$429k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
-51%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GERARD'S HOUSE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue +101%
  • OY
    Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +357%
  • MM
    Many Mothers Inc
    4× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +286%

Funded once

  • PW
    PRISON WRITES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -51% · 25% of their budget
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Molino de Suenos

Animal rescue and sanctuary and relocation of animals. Reprogramming rescued animals into service and therapy animals to serve the community.

Animals
2
Little Shelter Animal Adoption Center Inc

Little shelter animal adoption center, one of long island's oldest no-kill shelters,is dedicated to saving all companion animals whose lives are in jeopardy. throughrescue from kill facilities, rehabilitation of sick and un-socialized…

Animals
3
Animal Lighthouse Rescue Inc

The rescue of stray dogs in puerto rico, called satos. our team of volunteers in new york city works closely with el faro de los animales, a no-kill shelter in humacao,pr. our mission is to better the quality of life for abandoned satos by…

Animals
4
American Alliance for Protection of Animals Aapa Inc

American Alliance for Protection of Animals is a not for profit charity organization based in New York City, that protects animals and promotes animal welfare. We educate and spread awareness about animal cruelty and neglect and puppy…

Animals
5
Wayward Ranch Animal Sanctuary Inc

The organization is an animal rescue and sanctuary that provides quality life to the animals who need it the most.

Animals
6
Waldos Rescue Pen Inc

Waldo's is based out of New York, NY and partners with organizations throughout the states and Puerto Rico to save the lives of dogs of all ages and breeds that have been abadoned, abused, or left homeless. Waldo's works to give these…

Animals
7
Barking Mad Animal Rescue

Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…

Animals
8
Animal Village Nm

Saving animals from euthanasia, resulting in healthy pets being adopted.

Animals
9
Animal Welfare Society of Bandera County

Rescue and vet care for homeless dogs and cats

Animals
10
Humane Society of Bergen County Lost Pet Inc

To provide advocates, rescue, shelter, feeding ,medical care, neutering services and promotion and coordiantion of foster care services for animals.

Animals
11
Animal Sanctuary Society Inc

ANIMAL RESCUE and adoption of animals

Animals
12
The Little Ones Animal Center

Shelter and care for abused and unwanted animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Bridge Animal Welfare Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Prison Writes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HALOS HELP AFTER LOSS: $87,000 · OtherHALOS HELP AFTER LOSSSAINT ALOYSIUS ELEMENTARY ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherSAINT ALOYSIUS ELEMENTARY ACADEMYALL ANIMALS MATTER: $24,900 · OtherALL ANIMALS MATTERLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NY: $5,100 · OtherMany Mothers Inc: $51,196 · Human ServicesMany Mothers IncHOUR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesHOUR CHILDREN INCLITTLE SUN PEOPLE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SUN PEOPLE INCPRISON WRITES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPRISON WRITES INCGERARD'S HOUSE: $87,028 · HealthGERARD'S HOUSEOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $80,000 · EducationOholei Yosef Yitzch…BROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION: $15,000 · AnimalsBROOKLYN …AMA Animal Rescue Incorporated: $14,000 · AnimalsAMA Anima…WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK…
Other$147,000Human Services$116,196Health$87,028Education$80,000Animals$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGERARD'S HOUSE: $87,028 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $80,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetMany Mothers Inc: $51,196 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE SUN PEOPLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMA Animal Rescue Incorporated: $14,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRISON WRITES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Many Mothers Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SUN PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds AMA Animal Rescue Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON WRITES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy M Hamilton & Fred Hamilton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy M Hamilton & Fred Hamilton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy M Hamilton & Fred Hamilton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph