Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy Louise Blossman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$78kReligion$3kHuman Services$880Health$630Youth Development$460Housing & Shelter$320Public Safety & Disaster$145Food & Nutrition$110Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$100
COVENANT HOUSE$100
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $695) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $60 → 20%DES ORMEAUX FOUNDATION: $200 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $50 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $50 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $35 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
CT
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 21 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
33

Total granted

$52k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+27%

Still filing today

14%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2023 · $6k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
9
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Saint Agnes Medical Foundation

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical foundation is a member of saint agnes medical…

Health
12
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coastal Rewards. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH ABBEY AND SEMINARY COLLEGE: $2,950 · Other+37 more: $41,045 · Other+37 moreSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $435 · Human ServicesDesormeaux Foundation Inc: $200 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $60 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $390 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $35 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $30 · HealthSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $110 · Food & NutritionCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $95 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $75 · Recreation & SportsStudents for Life of America Inc: $75 · Civil Rights
Other$81,995Education$5,000Human Services$740Health$505Food & Nutrition$110International$95Recreation & Sports$75Civil Rights$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $435 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $390 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDesormeaux Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $95 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL REWARDS ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy Louise Blossman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy Louise Blossman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dorothy Louise Blossman Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dorothy Louise Blossman Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorothy Louise Blossman’s filings →

More from the funding graph