Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dorothy Friend M Ita

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$487k
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,750
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$1,750
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$1,750
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
DUKE UNIVERSITY$1,750
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,750
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON$1,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $2k → 12%WOFFORD COLLEGE: $1k → 15%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $2k → 18%LANDER UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $2k → 12%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1k → 16%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$321k · 29 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
52

Total granted

$321k
$153k

Still filing today

10%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2025 · $109k
  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +88%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    3× · 2018–2025 · $21k

Funded once

  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FBO
    one grant, 2024 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CC
    COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
2
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
3
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
4
Greensboro College

An academic and social community that unites the liberal arts and Judeo-Christian values.

Education
5
Southwestern Christian University

Providing christ-centered liberal arts education, empowering graduates to excel.

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
William Peace University

Prepare students for careers in the organizations of tomorrow.

Education
9
Houghton University

A nationally ranked christian university founded by the wesleyan church.

Education
10
Gardner-Webb University

Gardner-webb university, a private, christian, baptist-related university, provides outstanding undergraduate and graduate education that is strongly grounded in the liberal arts while offering opportunities to prepare for various…

Education
11
Limestone University

Limestone university is a four-year, liberal arts institution in gaffney, sc. established in 1845, limestone offers masters, bachelor and associate degrees through traditional and non-traditional educational opportunities.

Education
12
University of the South

An Episcopal University composed of the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Theology.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Greenville University and the most unlike its peers is Anderson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY — $108,500 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FBO — $36,240 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FBOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $20,500 · Other+80 more — $272,434 · Other+80 moreANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $34,000 · EducationANDERSON U…SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $9,512 · EducationSOUTHERN W…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,750 · EducationNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $1,750 · EducationPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $2,750 · Housing & Shelter
Other$437,674Education$47,012Housing & Shelter$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $34,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $9,512 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dorothy Friend M Ita funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph