Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$28kEducation$3kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$800Arts & Culture$500Youth Development$500International$480Health$375Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $2,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,122 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$100
Median grant
2
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tomchai Shabbos of Lakewood$1,420
RCCS$450
Bais Tova Girls School$200
Chofetz Chaim Heritage Foundation$180
Bais Medrash of Elmwood$100
Lev Rochel Bikur Cholim$100
New York Bota Sefer$100
Refua Fund$100
Rivka Laufer Bikur Cholim$100
Bnos Yisroel School for Girls$50
Hatzolah$50
Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $175) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $75 → 20%MISASKIM: $50 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 24 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
91

Total granted

$23k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+38%

Still filing today

29%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $400 · revenue +135%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR
    2× · 2019–2022 · $280 · revenue +34%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    4× · 2017–2022 · $200 · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NY
    New York Bais Seler
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $550
  • LB
    Lev Berl Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
11
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
12
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Kupat Ha'ir; the most unlike its peers is Mesivta of North Jersey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New York Bota Sefer: $13,800 · OtherNew York Bota SeferNew York Bais Seler: $3,000 · OtherNew York Bais SelerTomchai Shabbos of Lakewood: $1,520 · Other+90 more: $17,833 · Other+90 moreFRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $500 · Human ServicesYISROEL RELIEF FUND: $250 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $200 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $180 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $150 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $150 · Human ServicesUnited Charity of Jerusalem: $100 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $75 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $280 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $280 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $200 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $100 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $50 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $50 · ReligionSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $400 · EducationBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $150 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $125 · EducationBNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $100 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $75 · EducationKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $50 · EducationMESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $50 · EducationTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $50 · Food & NutritionSHUVU RETURN INC: $50 · Philanthropy
Other$36,153Human Services$1,605Religion$960Education$950Food & Nutrition$50Philanthropy$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYISROEL RELIEF FUND: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Charity of Jerusalem: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YISROEL RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY30.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Donors Fund Inc · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Lench Charity Trust · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Donner Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Donner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $41k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph