Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donna & Spencer Gilbert Foundation

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$96kEducation$89kReligion$67kHealth$47kHuman Services$29kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL$19,060
STAND WITH US$18,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$18,000
HEBREW FREE LOANS OF SAN DIEGO$18,000
VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS$3,456
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS: $29k → 10%HEBREW FREE LOANS OF SAN DIEGO: $18k → 11%STAND WITH US: $60k → 14%NETWORK FOR GOOD: $17k → 14%CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $20k → 10%SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY: $10k → 11%STAND WITH US: $18k → 14%VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS: $12k → 10%SEACREST VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $19k → 10%Seacrest Village Foundation: $1k → 11%PASADENA JEWISH TEMPLE: $10k → 14%GIVE BUTTER: $10k → 10%University of Southern Californina: $56k → 14%CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS: $4k → 10%WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%Congregation B'nai Israel: $9k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS: $3k → 10%WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $22k → 14%CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%Misceallaneous Separate Donations: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$252k · 5 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$252k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-3%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $78k · revenue +1%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $67k
  • VO
    VARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
6
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
7
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish University; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $67,321 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAELVARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONS: $48,267 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER SEPARATE DONATIONSWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $47,000 · OtherWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCESHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGO: $18,000 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGOSEACREST VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $8,486 · OtherISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $78,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCEFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $18,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEF…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $71,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN …SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEM…AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $8,200 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERS…NETWORK FOR GOOD: $17,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$220,074International$96,000Education$89,200Public Safety & Disaster$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $78,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $71,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $47,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGO: $18,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $8,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donna & Spencer Gilbert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donna & Spencer Gilbert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Donna & Spencer Gilbert Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Donna & Spencer Gilbert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donna & Spencer Gilbert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph