Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dominick Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$110kHuman Services$84kInternational$60kFood & Nutrition$46kCivil Rights$23kHousing & Shelter$20kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$544k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE OF MERCY$10,000
PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION$10,000
STUDENTS FOR LIFE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$5,000
SAVE THE STORKS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRE-BORN INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Dominick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 49%.

Dominick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 12 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$341k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+112%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
InternationalReligionCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF MERCY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +393%
  • SF
    Students for Life of America Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +18%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • 4
    4AFRICA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -17%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MP
    Mission Pre-Born Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +112%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LAST WELL INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE LAST WELL INCPAUL STEFAN HOME FOR UNWED MOTHERS: $45,000 · OtherPAUL STEFAN HOME FOR UNWED MOTHERSIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherPAUL STEFAN FOUNDATIONSO OTHERS MAY EAT: $15,000 · OtherSO OTHERS MAY EATSAMARITAN'S PURSE DORIAN RELIEF: $10,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE DORIAN RELIEFFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · Other+3 more: $15,000 · Other+3 moreHOUSE OF MERCY: $79,500 · ReligionHOUSE OF MERCYFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $45,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE PO…4AFRICA: $5,000 · International4AFRICAStudents for Life of America Inc: $22,500 · Civil RightsSave the Storks: $20,000 · HealthMission Pre-Born Inc: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$183,500Religion$79,500International$50,500Civil Rights$22,500Health$20,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSE OF MERCY: $79,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $45,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSave the Storks: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget4AFRICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Save the Storks ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 4AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dominick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dominick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dominick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph