Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dobson Tape Ministry

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2026still arriving
23
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$117kEducation$43kInternational$42kPhilanthropy$41kFood & Nutrition$25kArts & Culture$20kYouth Development$20kHealth$16kOther$0
02FY2026 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k22 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$5,000
KB CHARITABLE TRUST$5,000
ENCOURAGING WORD$5,000
PREMIER ARTS COLLECTIVE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ONE LIFE INSTITUTE$3,000
UNTO$3,000
CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTERS$3,000
SC SCHOOL FOR DEAF AND BLIND$2,500
TRIUNE MERCY CENTER$2,000
SCHOOL MINISTRIES$2,000
THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN$2,000
FAVOR$2,000
NAMI$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 18%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 18%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 18%Piedmont Womens Center: $1k → 10%Piedmont Womens Center: $1k → 10%Piedmont Womens Center: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$424k · 37 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
12

Total granted

$424k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+14%

Still filing today

49%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE)
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +41%
  • SH
    SIDEWALK HOPE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • OI
    ONELIFE INSTITUTE INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $18k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CC
    Christ Central
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • H
    Haggai
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HI
    Haggai International
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
3
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
4
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
5
Wofford College

The purpose of wofford college is to function as a liberal arts institution of superior quality. its chief concern is the development of an intellectual, spiritual, and aesthetic atmosphere in which serious and inquiring minds of students…

—
6
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary

To equip men to be preachers, pastors, and churchmen for christ's kingdom among the nations.

Education
7
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
8
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
9
Campus Outreach Columbia

An interdenominational college ministry on seven college campuses across north and south carolina. goal is to see students leave college equipped and passionate to walk with jesus in the church and spread his love to others.

Philanthropy
10
Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries

A Baptist ministry for children and families of South Carolina that provides residential care for children in need along with counseling, educational, and referral services while developing and strengthening positive relationships in a…

Human Services
11
Greenville Classical Academy

Provide a distinctly Christ-centered, biblical and classical education producing students who glorify God in their thoughts, words and deeds.

Education
12
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thornwell; the most unlike its peers is Tim Lee Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEncouraging Word: $30,500 · OtherEncouraging WordIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSC SCHOOL FOR DEAF AND BLIND: $15,750 · OtherSC SCHOOL FOR DEAF AND BLINDUNTO INC: $15,000 · OtherPREMIER ARTS COLLECTIVE: $15,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTERS: $12,000 · OtherSEARCH MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 · OtherFAVOR: $12,000 · OtherChrist Central: $10,000 · OtherHaggai: $10,000 · OtherHaggai International: $10,000 · OtherPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+23 more: $70,830 · Other+23 moreKB CHARITABLE TRUST: $30,000 · PhilanthropyKB CHARIT…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST H…TRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $12,000 · Food & NutritionTRIUNE ME…ONELIFE INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 · ReligionONELIFE I…The Premier Foundation: $15,000 · ReligionThe Premi…UNITED MINISTRIES: $6,000 · ReligionUNITED MI…School Ministries Inc: $12,000 · EducationThe King's College: $5,000 · EducationLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationLEGACY EARLY COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationSET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE): $25,000 · InternationalSIDEWALK HOPE INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$291,080Philanthropy$42,000Food & Nutrition$42,000Religion$39,000Education$27,000International$25,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKB CHARITABLE TRUST: $30,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE): $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSIDEWALK HOPE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetONELIFE INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Premier Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSchool Ministries Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWELL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe King's College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJASMINE ROAD INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY EARLY COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTim Lee Ministries: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KB CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE) ↗
  • Who funds SIDEWALK HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONELIFE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Premier Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TRIUNE MERCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds School Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THORNWELL ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The King's College ↗
  • Who funds LIMESTONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JASMINE ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY EARLY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Carolina Christian FoundationSC27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Carolina Christian Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · The Jolley Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Yeargin Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Kellett Family Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dobson Tape Ministry funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dobson Tape Ministry. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dobson Tape Ministry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph