Skip to content

· Public charity

Dj Foundation Inc

To enhance the life experiences of children and college age adults through golf programs and other initiatives that build morals and character through means that are exclusively for charitable and educational purposes.

$229k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$752kEducation$215kHealth$59kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$15k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $199,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $228,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON AND TERRELL GOLF SCHOOL LLC$153,400
METHODIST UNIVERSITY INC$20,000
PROJECT GOLF$16,000
SOCASTEE HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOMELESS VETERANS SERVICES OF DALLAS INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$840k · 3 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$840k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
-1%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JOHNSON AND TERRELL GOLF SCHOOL LLC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $790k
  • MU
    METHODIST UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +2%
  • SL
    SOUTHSTRAND LIONS CLUB
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • DB
    DREAM BIGGER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • TF
    THE FALDO TRUST FOR TOMORROW'S CHAMPIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Golf Association

To preserve, promote, and serve the game of golf

—
2
Georgia State Golf Association

Promotion of game/rules of golf throughout the state of georgia

Recreation & Sports
3
Professional Golfers Association of Carolinas Pga Section

Promote the enjoyment and involvement in the game of golf within the carolinas and to contribute to its growth by providing services to golf professionals and the golf industry within the carolinas.

Recreation & Sports
4
Houston Energy & Luxury Brand Golf Chari

To raise funds for cancer research

—
5
Virginia State Golf Association

The mission of the virginia state golf association is to promote the game of golf and serve the needs of golf in virginia.

Recreation & Sports
6
Carolinas Golf Association

The cga is a non-profit service organization that was formed in 1909 to conduct championships and tournaments for amateur golfers in north and south carolina, administer the usga handicap system in the carolinas, and support its membership…

Recreation & Sports
7
Professional Golfers Assoc of America Southern Texas Section

To promote the enjoyment and involvement in the game of golf and to contribute to the growth of the golf professional and the golf industry. the southern texas section will accomplish this mission by enhancing the skills of golf…

—
8
Southern States Athletic Conference

Promote athletics for member colleges and universities by organizing schedules, promulgatin rules, tv promotion, and obtaining sponsorships

Recreation & Sports
9
The Texas Golf Association

To promote the playing and advancement of the royal and ancient game of golf in texas.

—
10
Smu Golf Foundation

Support men's and women's intercollegiate golf programs at SMU

Education
11
Southern California Golf Association

Southern california golf association's mission is to promote the game of golf.

—
12
The Professional Golfers Assoc of America

None

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Golf; the most unlike its peers is Hug Your People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNSON AND TERRELL GOLF SCHOOL LLC: $790,347 · OtherJOHNSON AND TERRELL GOLF SCHOOL LLCIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherDREAM BIGGER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+7 more: $89,500 · Other+7 moreMETHODIST UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthPROJECT GOLF: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $15,000 · Community ImprovementHomeless Veterans Services Of Dallas Inc: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$959,847Education$40,000Health$20,000Recreation & Sports$16,000Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETHODIST UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT GOLF: $16,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Veterans Services Of Dallas Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetMYRTLE BEACH GOLF HOLIDAY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dj Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dj Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dj Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dj Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $192k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dj’s filings →

    More from the funding graph