Skip to content

· Private foundation

Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc

The mission of the organization is to bring about a transformation to society that supports the social, cultural, educational, and medical needs of women anywhere in the world.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$326kInternational$85kCommunity Improvement$75kSocial Science$26kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$35,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ASSOCIATION OF INDIAS DEVELOPMENT$35,200
MEN AGAINST VIOLENCE AND ABUSE$35,076
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 66% of grant dollars ($379k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 34% that went abroad ($198k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARITY LAB INC: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 34% of all-years giving ($198k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$198k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 4 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +295% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$496k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+295%
+27%

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MEN AGAINST VIOLENCE AND ABUSE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $198k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2022 · $128k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $95k

Funded once

  • PL
    Parity Lab Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +2%
  • CI
    CRITERION INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    Suzan Ozawa Policy and Research
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEN AGAINST VIOLENCE AND ABUSE: $198,218 · OtherMEN AGAINST VIOLENCE AND ABUSEIndividual grant recipient: $128,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPREVENTABLE SURPRISES INC: $75,000 · OtherPREVENTABLE SURPRISES INCCRITERION INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $5,625 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC: $35,200 · InternationalParity Lab Inc: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$521,843International$35,200Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPREVENTABLE SURPRISES INC: $75,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC: $35,200 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCRITERION INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PREVENTABLE SURPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Parity Lab Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRITERION INSTITUTE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters’ filings →

    More from the funding graph