Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dino Olivetti Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$299kEducation$36kArts & Culture$21kReligion$10kRecreation & Sports$5kScience & Tech$3kEnvironment$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$920k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION$25,000
CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION$3,000
GROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC$1,000
DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2k → 14%DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $500 → 9%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%DISA BOOSTER CLUB: $5k → 9%FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $5k → 12%TOWN OF GOSHEN: $2k → 9%PROMISING PAGES: $1k → 10%ARTS IN THE OPEN: $3k → 7%GROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC: $5k → 12%BLAIR ACADEMY: $5k → 7%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $5k → 12%GROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC: $1k → 12%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $3k → 12%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%The Episcopal Church in South CarolinaDiocese of: $10k → 12%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $10k → 12%KINDNESS CONQUERS FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $10k → 12%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $10k → 12%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 5 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$386k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+42%

Still filing today

80%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +62%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +5%
  • FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TE
    The Episcopal Church in South CarolinaDiocese of
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • DB
    DISA BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BA
    BLAIR ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
2
Colorectal Cancer Alliance

The mission of the colorectal cancer alliance is end colon and rectal cancer and support the nearly 50,000 afflicted with this disease each year. this is achieved by supporting preventative measures, accelerating research toward cures, and…

Health
3
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
4
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
5
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
6
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
9
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
12
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $254,000 · HealthAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $83,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION+2 more: $5,000 · HealthCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $30,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF CHA…The Episcopal Church in South CarolinaDiocese of: $10,000 · OtherThe Episcopal …DISA BOOSTER CLUB: $5,000 · OtherDISA BOOSTER C…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION-DENVER CAMPUS: $2,500 · OtherARTS IN THE OPEN: $2,500 · OtherTOWN OF GOSHEN: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherFOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureGROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureBLAIR ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $500 · Environment
Health$342,000Other$53,000Arts & Culture$19,000Education$5,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $254,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $83,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetFOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKindness Conquers Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPromising Pages Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORKS ART LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Kindness Conquers Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Promising Pages Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dino Olivetti Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dino Olivetti Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Blair Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dino Olivetti Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dino Olivetti Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dino Olivetti’s filings →

More from the funding graph