· Private foundation
Dietz Family Foundation 1730-03-44
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
75% of Dietz Family Foundation 1730-03-44’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Dietz Family Foundation 1730-03-44 named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $735k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k16 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $113k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| KIMMEL CENTER INC | $75,000 |
| CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION | $30,730 |
| THE FREE LIBRARY OF | $25,000 |
| BARNES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| Golden Slipper Club Camp & Charities | $12,500 |
| MOORESTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| SHORE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PROTESTANT COMMUNITY CHURCH | $6,000 |
| NJCTS | $5,000 |
| ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| MEND | $5,000 |
| DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RENEE PARKER MONIHAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SAMARITAN | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 56% of Dietz Family Foundation 1730-03-44’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 76% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY4× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +15%
- KCKIMMEL CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $325k · revenue +624%
- CCCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $128k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- CGCO Glenmede Trust Co NAone grant, 2019 · $1.0M
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEone grant, 2021 · $50k
MARCH OF DIMES INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Physician services in conjunction with monmouth medical center's medical education and teaching program. monmouth medical center, a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, provides medically necessary…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To support the charitable tax-exempt purposes, programs and services of monmouth medical center; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which provides medically necessary healthcare services to all…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Muhlenberg regional medical center is committed to excellence in
To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Deborah Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KIMMEL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RENEE PARKER MONIHAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEND I INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds BANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MEDFORD ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds KENNY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dietz Family Foundation 1730-03-44 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.