Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dick Smith Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$327kReligion$316kHousing & Shelter$296kRecreation & Sports$276kInternational$94kHealth$29kYouth Development$24kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$759k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP COLE$50,000
FAMILY SHELTER$24,000
BAPTIST CONVENTION OF NEW ENGLAND$18,000
PRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION$15,000
PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA$13,000
JUBILEE ACADEMY$12,000
PRISMA HEALTH-UPSTATE FOUNDATION$10,000
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION$4,500
CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC$3,840
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL$3,600
TRACY'S CAMP$3,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$3,000
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CONNIE MAXWELL CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
VA
TN
NC
SC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 30 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
31

Total granted

$1.3M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

47%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    Jubilee Academy Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +803%
  • HN
    Homeless No More Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $94k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BC
    BAPTIST CONVENTION OF NEW
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
3
North Greenville University

North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.

Education
4
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
5
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
7
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
8
Carolina University

A christ-centered university committed to exceptional teaching, scholarly research, creative innovation, and professional collaboration.

Education
9
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
10
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
11
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
12
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Christian Ministries International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP COLE: $275,000 · OtherCAMP COLEFAMILY SHELTER INC: $196,000 · OtherFAMILY SHELTER INCBAPTIST CONVENTION OF NEW ENGLAND: $153,500 · OtherBAPTIST CONVENTION OF NEW ENGLANDUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA: $40,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $35,760 · Other+43 more: $174,900 · Other+43 moreUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of…MISSION DEVELOPMENT MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · EducationMISSION DEVEL…ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationQueens University of Charlotte: $6,000 · Education+6 more: $18,000 · Education+6 moreHomeless No More Inc: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE MARGARET HOME INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterJubilee Academy Inc: $104,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $93,500 · InternationalGLOBAL FRONTIER MISSIONS INC: $30,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionTRACY'S CAMP INC: $23,750 · Youth Development
Other$875,160Education$162,000Housing & Shelter$110,000Human Services$104,500International$93,500Religion$31,000Youth Development$23,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SHELTER INC: $196,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetJubilee Academy Inc: $104,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetHomeless No More Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $93,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $35,760 over 9y, 10% of budgetGLOBAL FRONTIER MISSIONS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION DEVELOPMENT MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetTRACY'S CAMP INC: $23,750 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health-Upstate Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARGARET HOME INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBERRY COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnie Maxwell Children's Ministries: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FRONTIER MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION DEVELOPMENT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRACY'S CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MARGARET HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWBERRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Wolfe Family Foundation · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · McKesson Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dick Smith Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dick Smith Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dick Smith Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dick Smith Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dick Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph