Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diamond Ruby Foundation Suc-Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$553kHealth$95kEducation$47kReligion$37kScience & Tech$32kHuman Services$31kInternational$11kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
$5,281
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Israel - R. Diamond Capital Improvement Fund$84,492
Jewish Federation of North America$52,807
Apalachee Federation of Jewish Charities$34,325
Temple Israel Federation of Jewish Charities$18,483
Miracle Hill Nursing Home$10,561
Florida A&M University Foundation$10,561
River Garden Hebrew Home for the Aged$5,281
Union for Reform Judaism$5,281
United Way of the Big Bend$5,281
Albert Einstein College of Medicine$5,281
American Committee for Weizman Institute of Science$5,281
American Friends of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem$5,281
American Technion Society$5,281
B'NAI B'RITH Foundation$5,281
Salvation Army of Tallahassee$5,281
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$658k · 22 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$658k
$9k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    Florida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +19%
  • RG
    RIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +6%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HI
    Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • ES
    Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • H
    Hillel
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—
3
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
4
North Carolina Hillel Foundation

To empower and inspire north carolina's jewish college students to pursue their own jewish journeys by creating strong communities and transformative experiences.

—
5
Florida Hebrew University Inc
Education
6
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
7
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
11
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

—
12
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Southern Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Holocaust Education Resource Counci. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Temple Israel - R. Diamond Capital Improvement Fund: $252,419 · OtherTemple Israel - R. Diamond Capital Improvement FundTemple Israel Federation of Jewish Charities: $55,217 · OtherTemple Israel Federation of Jewish CharitiesMiracle Hill Nursing Home: $21,056 · OtherNational Jewish Health: $20,991 · Other+12 more: $131,113 · Other+12 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $157,761 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH A…APALACHEE FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIES INC: $71,995 · PhilanthropyAPALACHEE FEDERATION OF JEWISH CH…UNITED WAY OF THE BIG BEND INC: $15,776 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE BIG BEND INCRIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC: $15,776 · HealthJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,776 · HealthEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $5,538 · HealthFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc: $31,552 · EducationHIAS INC: $11,076 · InternationalHOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCI: $10,657 · Arts & CultureMCCJ INC: $7,888 · Civil Rights
Other$480,796Philanthropy$245,532Health$37,090Education$31,552International$11,076Arts & Culture$10,657Civil Rights$7,888

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $157,761 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAPALACHEE FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIES INC: $71,995 over 2y, 44% of budgetFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc: $31,552 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BIG BEND INC: $15,776 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC: $15,776 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,776 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIAS INC: $11,076 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCI: $10,657 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMCCJ INC: $7,888 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $5,538 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT FSU FOUNDATION INC: $3,876 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds APALACHEE FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BIG BEND INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds JBI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCI ↗
  • Who funds MCCJ INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT FSU FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $306k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diamond Ruby Foundation Suc-Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph