Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diamond Rose Ann Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$531kHealth$498kEducation$473kHuman Services$144kMembership Benefit$85kRecreation & Sports$75kEnvironment$35kArts & Culture$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $205k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$25,000
ST MALACHY'S CHURCH$25,000
ANDRADE-FAXON CHARITIES$20,000
FIRST TEE - METROPOLITAN NY$15,000
SULLIVAN - ULSTER HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$15,000
LEWY BODY DEMENTIA ASSOCIATION INC$15,000
GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$10,000
COMMUNITY CHURCH OF WURTSBORO$10,000
VFW POST 4947$10,000
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$10,000
NEW JERSEY STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION$10,000
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS$10,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 1266$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $8k → 11%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
RI
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 29 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
14

Total granted

$1.7M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-37%

Still filing today

24%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAMAKATING FIRST AID SQUAD INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $215k · revenue +172%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2021–2022 · $64k · revenue +96%
  • GH
    Garnet Health Medical Center - Catskills
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • LO
    LUBAVITCH OUTREACH OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
  • TF
    THE FIRST TREE OF METROPOLITAN NY
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • CD
    CAROL DIAMOND SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Garnet Health

To maintain an integrated health delivery system of providers and hospitals resulting in improved health for our community by providing exceptional healthcare to our patients.

Health
12
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Garnet Health Medical Center - Catskills; the most unlike its peers is The Glaucoma Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MALACHYS CHURCH: $270,000 · OtherST MALACHYS CHURCHAMERICAN LEGION POST 1266: $85,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION POST 1266VFW POST 4947: $85,000 · OtherVFW POST 4947ST THOMAS UNIVERSITY: $77,058 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF WURTSORO: $75,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherMAMAKATING LIBRARY: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherORMC REHAB CENTER: $65,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $64,000 · Other+28 more: $577,200 · Other+28 moreMAMAKATING FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $215,000 · HealthMAMAKATING FIRST …Garnet Health Medical Center - Catskills: $35,000 · HealthGarnet Health Med…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $103,000 · EducationGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesQUIET OAKS: $8,000 · Human ServicesBILLY ANDRADE-BRAD FAXON CHARITIES FOR CHILDREN INC: $21,000 · PhilanthropyTIME AND THE VALLEYS MUSEUM: $20,000 · EnvironmentORANGE COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,503,258Health$305,000Education$103,000Human Services$38,000Philanthropy$21,000Environment$20,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAMAKATING FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $215,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $103,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $64,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetGarnet Health Medical Center - Catskills: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILLY ANDRADE-BRAD FAXON CHARITIES FOR CHILDREN INC: $21,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTIME AND THE VALLEYS MUSEUM: $20,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetQUIET OAKS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAMAKATING FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Garnet Health Medical Center - Catskills ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLY ANDRADE-BRAD FAXON CHARITIES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TIME AND THE VALLEYS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diamond Rose Ann Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diamond Rose Ann Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diamond Rose Ann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph