· Private foundation
Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of DEWEY H & IRENE G MOOMAW FOUNDATION TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALPINE HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS OF TUSCARAWAS | $6,000 |
| DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| KSU - TUSC COUNTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $4,914 |
| TUSC COUNTY CENTRAL CATHOLIC | $3,500 |
| TUSC CO COUNCIL FOR CHURCH AND COMMUNITY | $3,500 |
| TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN ADULTS I | $3,500 |
| TUSCARAWAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $3,200 |
| AMERICAN LEGION | $2,794 |
| CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| ARROWHEAD JOINT FIRE DISTRICT | $2,500 |
| DOVER FIRST MORAVIAN CHURCH | $2,500 |
| OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO3× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +39%
- DADRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL3× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +60%
- CTCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- KTKSU TUSC COUNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $6k
- KSKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -9%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to educate and promote interest in agriculture, household arts, and livestock for residents of tuscarawas county ohio.
To preserve the history of tamaqua, pa
Collect and preserve area artifacts; maintain the 1892 historical building as a museum which includes the non-circulating historical library; preserve and record the history and culture of kutztown area
To provide medical and pharmaceutical care to the working uninsured residents of tuscarawas county, ohio. it will also provide health education, referrals and patient advocacy.
Research, preservation and dissemination of the history of the Township of Tewksbury, Hunterdon County, State of New Jersey.
To preserve the history of ashland county, ohio, and to provide educational opportunities to read about and experience said history and heritage.
To solicit and collect contributions for charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes to benefit the people of and around Tuscola County, Michigan
The mission of the clark county historical society is to collect, preerve, and interpret resources which provide understanding and appreciation of clark county's heritage, and to relate to the community's past to the present and its future.
To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs
Local historical education operation of a museum and provision of education relating to the history of tioga county pennsylvania
Promote an understanding of the history of washington county, ohio by collecting, preserving, and making available to the public, that history, and its relationship to the region beyond washington county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Tuscarawas County Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Philadelphia Band Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALPINE HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Homeless ↗
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
- Who funds THE TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Beneath The Shade ↗
- Who funds JUNEBERRY HILL SCHOOLHOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reeves Foundation · Haman Family Foundation Oag #98-1135 · Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation · Stark Community Foundation · Harold & Marjorie Rosenberry Foundation · Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation Trust · John & Orlena Marsh Foundation · Dover Exchange Club Childrens Foundation · Tuscarawas County Community Foundat · Helen V Brach Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · American Electric Power Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.